<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Madgett Law — News &amp; Articles</title><description>Legal articles, client education, and firm news from Madgett Law, LLC in Minneapolis, Minnesota.</description><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/</link><language>en-us</language><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Junk Fee Law Exempts Fees, Not Car Dealers — and the Doc Fee Cap Is the Lesser of $350 or Ten Percent</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-car-dealer-doc-fee-cap-168-27/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-car-dealer-doc-fee-cap-168-27/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s junk fee exemption is keyed to fees authorized by law, not to car dealers. The doc fee cap is the lesser of $350 or ten percent of the sale.</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Bans the Gym Termination Fee — and the Junk Fee Law Is Not Why</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-health-club-contract-fees-325g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-health-club-contract-fees-325g/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s club-contract sections ban the gym termination fee and give an injured member damages plus attorney&apos;s fees. The junk fee law gives an injunction.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Junk Fee Law Says &quot;Include,&quot; Not &quot;Disclose.&quot; The Safe Harbors Tell You Why.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-junk-fee-law-disclosure-is-not-inclusion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-junk-fee-law-disclosure-is-not-inclusion/</guid><description>The price on the listing page and the price at checkout are different numbers. Section 325D.44, subd. 1a(a) says the first one must include the fee.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Why the Notice That Lets a Minnesota Restaurant Keep a Service Charge Also Puts It in the Price</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-restaurant-service-charges-junk-fee-law/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-restaurant-service-charges-junk-fee-law/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s junk fee law shelters automatic and mandatory gratuities. The bold-type notice that lets a house keep a service charge says the charge is not one.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Lets a Business Surcharge Your Credit Card — Until It Stops Taking Cash</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-credit-card-surcharge-law-325g051/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-credit-card-surcharge-law-325g051/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325G.051 permits a card surcharge, caps it at five percent, and names no plaintiff. Who can sue, and why I read a cashless counter to violate the junk fee law by obeying it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Medical Assistance Transfer Penalty Does Not Start Running Until You Are Already Broke</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-assistance-transfer-penalty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-assistance-transfer-penalty/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 256B.0595, subd. 2(b)(2) starts the penalty clock only when the applicant is otherwise eligible and in care — not when the gift was made. And the lookback runs backward only: subd. 1(b) reaches transfers made &apos;any time after&apos; the request for payment, with no forward boundary at all.</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Chapter 144G Tells an Assisted Living Facility What to Disclose About Fees. It Never Says What a Family Gets If It Doesn&apos;t.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assisted-living-fees-chapter-504b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assisted-living-fees-chapter-504b/</guid><description>Chapter 144G gives a family no damages for an undisclosed assisted living fee. I read one sentence in § 144G.11 to borrow the remedy in § 504B.120.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Who Owns the Building When a Minnesota Congregation Splits</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-church-property-disputes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-church-property-disputes/</guid><description>Minnesota decides church property fights with neutral principles of law. The denominational trust clause is usually the weakest document in the file.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Commitment Ends in Six Months. The Firearms Disability It Triggers Has No End Date.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-commitment-253b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-commitment-253b/</guid><description>Chapter 253B measures commitment in six-month blocks, but Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(3) bars anyone who &apos;is or has ever been committed&apos; from possessing a firearm, with no expiration and only one way out. I walk the standards, the deadlines, and the consequences nobody explains at the hearing.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Public-Policy Exception to At-Will Employment Is One Sentence Long</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wrongful-discharge-public-policy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wrongful-discharge-public-policy/</guid><description>Phipps v. Clark Oil covers an employee fired for refusing to break the law, and nothing else. Minnesota&apos;s Supreme Court has refused three times to widen it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Gives You 14 Days of Paper and 60 Days to Sue. Only One of Those Numbers Is a Deadline.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-implied-consent-license-revocation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-implied-consent-license-revocation/</guid><description>The implied consent petition stopped being a 30-day filing on July 1, 2017. What Minn. Stat. § 169A.53 actually requires you to file and serve, what the hearing can decide, and where the search-warrant track under § 171.177 diverges.</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When a Private Person Sets the Police on You: Malicious Prosecution and the Instigation Element in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-malicious-prosecution-private-complainant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-malicious-prosecution-private-complainant/</guid><description>Minnesota does not ask who called the police. It asks who supplied the decision to charge — and what the officer or prosecutor was told.</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Ninety Days and Six Grounds: What It Takes to Vacate a Minnesota Arbitration Award</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-arbitration-vacating-award-572b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-arbitration-vacating-award-572b/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 572B.23(a) lists six grounds for vacating an arbitration award, and being right is not one of them. The clock in subsection (b) starts when you receive notice of the award — not when judgment enters, and not when your client decides to fight.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Open Meeting Law: What Chapter 13D Actually Punishes</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-open-meeting-law-13d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-open-meeting-law-13d/</guid><description>Chapter 13D never defines a meeting, never voids a decision, and almost never removes anyone from office. Here is what it does do, section by section.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Notarizes Deeds Over Video. The Identity Test Is Harder Than the One in the Room — and NIST Says Half of It Should Not Be Used.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-remote-online-notarization-358/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-remote-online-notarization-358/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 358.645 quantifies remote identity proofing down to the number of questions — a method NIST now prohibits. A bad notarization rarely voids a deed.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Someone Cloned Your Voice or Your Face. In Minnesota You Have One Real Claim — and It Is Not the New Statute.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-voice-and-likeness-cloning-remedies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-voice-and-likeness-cloning-remedies/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s 2026 forged-likeness amendment is criminal only, and no Minnesota statute creates a right of publicity. What is actually left to plead, and what it pays.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Who Made the Call? TCPA Traceback and the Attribution Problem</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/tcpa-robocall-traceback-why-attribution-fails/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/tcpa-robocall-traceback-why-attribution-fails/</guid><description>Federal law built an entire caller-authentication apparatus after 2019 — STIR/SHAKEN, traceback, the Robocall Mitigation Database. None of it is a plaintiff&apos;s tool, and here is why attribution still fails.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Number Minnesota Requires on Page One of Your Lease — and Treble Damages for Leaving It Out</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-apartment-fees-total-monthly-payment-504b120/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-apartment-fees-total-monthly-payment-504b120/</guid><description>Rent plus every nonoptional fee, summed on page one: Minn. Stat. § 504B.120 requires it on leases signed since January 1, 2024, reaches the listing, and trebles damages.</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Coerced Debt Act Has a Date Wall in It, and the Only Money Judgment Runs to the Creditor</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-coerced-debt-332-71/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-coerced-debt-332-71/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 332.71–332.75 let an abuse victim get a debt declared coerced and enforcement enjoined. It reaches only debts incurred on or after January 1, 2024, it excludes secured debt, and it awards the debtor no damages and no fees.</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The DPPA Pays $2,500 Per Lookup Without Proof of Harm. The Clock Starts the Day It Happens, Not the Day You Find Out.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-drivers-license-data-privacy-dppa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-drivers-license-data-privacy-dppa/</guid><description>18 U.S.C. § 2724 fixes liquidated damages at $2,500 with no showing of injury. But the Eighth Circuit applies the occurrence rule to the four-year clock, and Minnesota classifies driver data by a federal cross-reference frozen at May 23, 2005 — which the legislature loosened in 2026.</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Section 1983 Malicious Prosecution in the Eighth Circuit After Thompson v. Clark</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-section-1983-malicious-prosecution-fourth-amendment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-section-1983-malicious-prosecution-fourth-amendment/</guid><description>For thirty-two years the Eighth Circuit held that malicious prosecution is no constitutional violation at all. Thompson v. Clark ended that, and left four questions open.</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Work Product in Minnesota Is Narrower Than You Think, and the Gaps Are Where Cases Are Won</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-work-product-doctrine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-work-product-doctrine/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s supreme court says materials prepared in anticipation of litigation are &apos;not work product&apos; unless they carry counsel&apos;s mental impressions — and by rule, a party may take an opponent&apos;s nonparty witness statements without any showing at all.</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>AI-Assisted Identity Theft: What the Federal Data Actually Shows, and What It Cannot</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/ai-assisted-identity-theft-what-the-data-shows/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/ai-assisted-identity-theft-what-the-data-shows/</guid><description>The FBI tagged 460 of its 31,675 identity theft complaints with any AI reference in 2025, and the FTC&apos;s dataset has no AI field at all. What the federal sources actually document — and the defense.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>&quot;To My Surviving Children&quot; Switches Off Minnesota&apos;s Antilapse Statute. That Is the Statute&apos;s Own Language.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-antilapse-statute-524-2-603/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-antilapse-statute-524-2-603/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-603, subd. 2, makes words of survivorship a sufficient contrary intent — the legislature repealed the older section in 2001 and wrote this one in its place. And there is no § 524.2-706: the only nonprobate antilapse rule Minnesota wrote lives in the transfer on death deed statute.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Crime-Fraud Exception in Minnesota: What You Must Prove Before a Judge Will Read the File</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-crime-fraud-exception-privilege/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-crime-fraud-exception-privilege/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s privilege statute contains no crime-fraud exception. Here is the judge-made test, the prima facie showing it demands, and why in camera review is not the shortcut lawyers assume it is.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Environmental Rights Act Hands You a Burden Shift. It Takes It Back at the Injunction.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-environmental-rights-act-116b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-environmental-rights-act-116b/</guid><description>Chapter 116B lets any Minnesota resident sue to protect a natural resource. It provides no damages, no attorney fees, and an injunction the plaintiff must prove.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Two Routes, One Court: Judicial Review of a Minnesota Agency Decision</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-apa-judicial-review-14/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-apa-judicial-review-14/</guid><description>Chapter 14 review of a contested case and common-law certiorari both end in the Court of Appeals on a writ of certiorari. The fork is not which court — it is which clock, 30 days from receipt or 60 days to issue the writ, and no court may extend either.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Rights When a Background Check Costs You a Job in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-background-check-rights-employment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-background-check-rights-employment/</guid><description>The FCRA forces employers to build a four-document paper trail before rejecting you over a background check — and the step they skip is the one you cannot see.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Is Not a Four-Corners State: The Duty to Defend, the Duty to Indemnify, and Who Pays for the Lawyer</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-duty-to-defend-vs-indemnify/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-duty-to-defend-vs-indemnify/</guid><description>Minnesota decides the duty to defend from the complaint plus the facts the insurer knows — and those facts cut both ways. What that means for mixed complaints, reservations of rights, and refusals.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Favorable Termination in Minnesota, and What Thompson v. Clark Changed</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-favorable-termination-element/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-favorable-termination-element/</guid><description>The federal bar is now the easier one: a prosecution that ended without a conviction. Minnesota never said that — and the three dispositions clients want most are the three worst ways to end a case if you may want to sue.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Filing the Appeal Does Not Stop the Sheriff: Supersedeas Security in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-staying-judgment-pending-appeal-supersedeas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-staying-judgment-pending-appeal-supersedeas/</guid><description>Under Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 108, an appeal does not stay enforcement. The stay is bought — bond, letter of credit, or cash — in the district court first, and Minn. Stat. § 550.36 hides a ten-day statutory alternative.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Abuse of Process Claim Does Not Ask Why You Sued. It Asks What You Did With the Writ.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-abuse-of-process/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-abuse-of-process/</guid><description>Hoppe v. Klapperich gives the tort two elements, no favorable-termination requirement, and no probable-cause requirement — so it can be pleaded as a counterclaim while the underlying case is still open. Here is why nearly every Minnesota claim still fails.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Copied the Federal Class-Action Rule in 2006. The Federal Rule Kept Moving.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-class-actions-rule-23/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-class-actions-rule-23/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 23 tracks the 2003 federal rule, but certification appeals run through a 30-day Rule 105 petition, settlement approval skips the federal factor list, and leftover funds have a statutory destination.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Economic Loss Statute Bars Two Claims, Not Every Tort — and Two Separate Sales Have to Clear August 1, 2000</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-economic-loss-doctrine-604-101/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-economic-loss-doctrine-604-101/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.101 governs only if both sales postdate August 1, 2000. It bars two things — and leaves plain negligence, statutory claims, and fraud standing.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Chase Is Immune. The Driving Is Not. — Emergency Vehicles and Police Pursuits in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-emergency-vehicle-police-pursuit-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-emergency-vehicle-police-pursuit-liability/</guid><description>Minnesota gives emergency vehicles four narrow statutory privileges and none of them cancel the due-regard duty — but the decision to pursue is protected by official immunity, so the injured bystander&apos;s money usually comes from somewhere else.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Does Not Pick Between the Reasonable Doctor and the Reasonable Patient. It Uses Both, and You Only Need One.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-informed-consent-medical/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-informed-consent-medical/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s informed consent claim is negligent nondisclosure, and its disclosure duty has three separate triggers. Causation is objective, and expert testimony is required for some elements but not for the one that decides most cases.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The 240-Day Dram Shop Notice Does Not Apply to a Minnesota Social Host Claim. The Deadline Is Six Years.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-social-host-liability-340a-90/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-social-host-liability-340a-90/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 340A.802&apos;s notice and two-year bar are written to § 340A.801 claims against licensees. A § 340A.90 claim against the adult at the house runs on § 541.05, subd. 1(2) — six years — and the parental carve-out everyone cites is in the criminal statute only.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Judgment From a State You&apos;ve Never Lived In, for an Account You Never Opened. Do Not Argue the Account.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-defending-out-of-state-judgment-identity-theft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-defending-out-of-state-judgment-identity-theft/</guid><description>Full faith and credit closes the merits of an out-of-state judgment. What survives is jurisdiction — and in an identity-theft case the fight is over service, the address the thief supplied, and whether a creditor can prove an electronic signature was your act under Minn. Stat. § 325L.09.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Ending a Month-to-Month Tenancy in Minnesota: The Notice Math Everyone Gets Wrong</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ending-month-to-month-tenancy-504b135/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ending-month-to-month-tenancy-504b135/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.135 sets the notice period, but a century-old counting rule decides when the notice actually works — and the 14-day nonpayment notice to quit is no longer in the statute.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Liquidated Damages or Penalty? What Minnesota Courts Actually Measure</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-liquidated-damages-penalty-clauses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-liquidated-damages-penalty-clauses/</guid><description>Minnesota does not judge a stipulated-damages clause from a single moment in time — and when the clause is struck, the plaintiff does not lose the case. The two questions most treatments skip.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Parol Evidence Rule Is Not a Rule of Evidence. That Changes Where You Can Raise It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parol-evidence-integration-clauses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parol-evidence-integration-clauses/</guid><description>Minnesota treats the parol evidence rule as substantive contract law, not evidence — and a merger clause, however airtight, does not defeat a fraud-in-the-inducement claim.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota You Can Skip the Directed-Verdict Motion. Skip the New-Trial Motion and You Lose the Appeal.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-post-trial-motions-rule-50-59/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-post-trial-motions-rule-50-59/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 50.02 lets a party move for judgment as a matter of law after the verdict &apos;whether or not&apos; it moved before — the opposite of federal practice. Rule 59.03 is the deadline that actually decides what an appellate court will read.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Three Pots of Money for Minnesota Crime Victims — and the Order You Tap Them Matters</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-crime-victim-civil-remedies-611a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-crime-victim-civil-remedies-611a/</guid><description>Criminal restitution, the Crime Victims Reimbursement Board, and the civil suit are three separate recoveries under Minnesota law — and ch. 611A wires each one to reduce or credit the others.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Is Not a Daubert State: Frye-Mack and the Hearing You Probably Do Not Get</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-frye-mack-expert-evidence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-frye-mack-expert-evidence/</guid><description>Minnesota rejected Daubert. Here is the Frye-Mack two-prong standard, what actually triggers a hearing, and the standard of review on each prong.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Minnesota: The Promise Nobody Wrote</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-implied-covenant-good-faith-fair-dealing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-implied-covenant-good-faith-fair-dealing/</guid><description>Every Minnesota contract carries an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing — except employment contracts. What the covenant forbids, what it will not do, and how to plead it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Malicious Prosecution in Minnesota: The Elements, and the Special-Injury Rule Minnesota Never Adopted</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-malicious-prosecution-elements/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-malicious-prosecution-elements/</guid><description>Minnesota lets you sue over a civil lawsuit without an arrest, an attachment, or any special injury — and has since 1889. Here is what it demands instead, and why the claim still almost always fails.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Boat Owner Who Wasn&apos;t Driving Is Liable in Minnesota — and the Statute That Says So Is Not the One Anybody Cites</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-boating-accident-claims-86b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-boating-accident-claims-86b/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 86B.341, subd. 2 makes the owner and operator of a watercraft jointly and severally liable and presumes family members had consent. Meanwhile § 65B.43 keeps boats out of no-fault entirely: no PIP, no UM, no UIM. What is left is a straight negligence case with unusual evidence rules.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Child Labor Law: Why Following Chapter 181A Is Not Enough</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-child-labor-laws-181a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-child-labor-laws-181a/</guid><description>Minnesota lets a 14-year-old work eight hours a day until 9 p.m. Federal law caps the same kid at three hours on a school day. A practitioner&apos;s read of Minn. Stat. ch. 181A.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Declaratory Judgment Act: The Party You Leave Out Decides the Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-declaratory-judgment-act-555/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-declaratory-judgment-act-555/</guid><description>Chapter 555 lets a Minnesota court settle a dispute before anyone breaches. Section 555.11 decides whether the declaration you win is worth anything.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s False Claims Act: Treble Damages, a 30 Percent Relator&apos;s Share, and One Published Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-false-claims-act-15c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-false-claims-act-15c/</guid><description>Chapter 15C gives a relator treble damages and up to 30 percent of the recovery. In seventeen years it has produced one published appellate decision, and the relator lost.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In an Insolvent Minnesota Estate, the Creditors Who Get Paid Are Mostly the Ones Who Never Filed a Claim</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insolvent-estate-claim-priority/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insolvent-estate-claim-priority/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.3-805(a) sets seven classes of claims, not six, and § 524.3-715(18) lets the personal representative pay the top of that list without any claim being presented at all.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Nonconsensual Intimate Images in Minnesota: The Deepfake Claim Is the Stronger One</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nonconsensual-intimate-images-604-31/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nonconsensual-intimate-images-604-31/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s civil claim for a fake sexual image carries a statutory penalty ten times the one for a real image — and drops an element. Four statutes, two clocks, one federal lever.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Kills Private Covenants at 30 Years — Then Exempts Almost Every Covenant Regime You Would Actually Encounter</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-restrictive-covenants-500-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-restrictive-covenants-500-20/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd. 2a ends private covenants at 30 years, but eight enumerated exceptions carve out condominiums, cooperatives, CICs under ch. 515B, shared-structure buildings, and affordable housing. What is left is the plain platted subdivision — and a two-year renewal window most claimants never see.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Owning the Lakebed Buys You Nothing on the Surface: What Minnesota Riparian Rights Actually Attach To</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-riparian-rights-lakeshore/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-riparian-rights-lakeshore/</guid><description>Minnesota riparian rights attach to ownership of the shore, and can also arise from ownership of the bed, but no titleholder gets exclusive control of the surface. Johnson v. Seifert lets every abutting owner use the whole surface regardless of navigability and regardless of who owns the bottom — and three different legal lines govern where your lakeshore ends.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Temporary Restraining Order Has No Expiration Date. The Rule&apos;s Own Heading Says &apos;Duration&apos; and Then Sets None.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-temporary-injunctions-rule-65/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-temporary-injunctions-rule-65/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 65.01 is captioned &apos;Temporary Restraining Order; Notice; Hearing; Duration&apos; — and unlike Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2), it sets no 14-day limit, no outside date, no extension mechanism. What actually ends a Minnesota TRO, and what the Dahlberg factors really demand.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Towed in Minnesota: The Car Is Collateral. Your Belongings Are Not.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-towing-impound-rights-168b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-towing-impound-rights-168b/</guid><description>Minnesota Chapter 168B lets a lot hold your car until you pay — but not your ID, medicine, or, for many owners, anything else in it. Plus notice, sale, and deficiency rules.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota UTMA Account Ends at 21 — Unless a Fiduciary or an Obligor Funded It Before May 17, 2020</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-utma-custodial-accounts-527/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-utma-custodial-accounts-527/</guid><description>Minnesota gives the transferor no choice of termination age, and § 527.42 leaves a whole class of older custodial accounts still ending at 18. Chapter 527 also redefines &apos;adult&apos; as 21, which disqualifies most young custodians.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>MNOSHA Employee Rights: The Private Action Federal OSHA Does Not Give You</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workplace-safety-mosha-rights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workplace-safety-mosha-rights/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s occupational safety act lets a retaliated-against employee sue in district court, in front of a jury. Federal law does not. What Minn. Stat. ch. 182 actually hands a worker — and where it stops.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Automatic-Renewal Law Tells Sellers Exactly What to Do. It Never Says What Happens If They Don&apos;t.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-automatic-renewal-subscriptions-325g-56/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-automatic-renewal-subscriptions-325g-56/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 325G.56–.63 govern subscriptions that renew themselves. The sections are unusually specific about conduct and conspicuously silent about damages — and the strongest consumer remedies in them are self-executing.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Never Opted Out, So You Get to Choose. The Hard Part Is That the Minnesota Numbers Are Not in the Statute Book.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-bankruptcy-exemptions-state-vs-federal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-bankruptcy-exemptions-state-vs-federal/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 550.371, subd. 1 affirmatively makes 11 U.S.C. § 522(d) available here. Three or four line items decide the choice — and one Minnesota subdivision can lock a separately filing spouse out of the other set for three years.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Captive-Audience Law Does Not Ban a Single Meeting — and It Gives the Employee 90 Days</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-captive-audience-meetings-181-531/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-captive-audience-meetings-181-531/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.531 prohibits punishing an employee who declines an employer&apos;s political or religious meeting — not the meeting itself. The state&apos;s own poster says so, and the private action expires 90 days after the violation.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota Cartway: How a Landlocked Owner Forces a Road Under § 164.08</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-cartway-landlocked-parcel-164-08/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-cartway-landlocked-parcel-164-08/</guid><description>The cartway statute says the town board &apos;shall&apos; establish a road to a landlocked five-acre parcel. That word is enforceable by mandamus — but it settles whether, not where, and the petitioner pays for all of it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Charitable Solicitation Registration in Minnesota: The $25,000 Exemption Is Four Tests, Not One</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-charitable-solicitation-registration-309/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-charitable-solicitation-registration-309/</guid><description>Minnesota Statutes chapter 309 requires registration with the Attorney General before soliciting. The small-charity exemption fails the moment anyone gets paid.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>What Chapter 504B Does Not Do for a Minnesota Business Tenant — and the Six Sections That Still Do</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-commercial-lease-basics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-commercial-lease-basics/</guid><description>Habitability, security deposits, late-fee caps, the 14-day notice, fee reciprocity: residential only. But distress for rent is abolished for everyone, redemption reaches commercial leases, and there is no duty to mitigate.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Taking a Default Judgment in Minnesota: What Rule 55 Actually Requires</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-default-judgment-rule-55/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-default-judgment-rule-55/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s default rule says judgment &apos;shall be entered&apos; — but the clerk track is far narrower than the federal one, a late defendant can defeat the motion outright, and a federal affidavit the rule never mentions applies to every case.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Deleted the Word That Used to Save Misclassifying Employers</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-independent-contractor-misclassification-181-722/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-independent-contractor-misclassification-181-722/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.722 was a misrepresentation statute until July 1, 2024. The rewrite dropped the misrepresentation element, added individual liability, and made the penalties recoverable by the worker.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Junk Fee Law Has No Damages Remedy — and That Is by Placement, Not by Accident</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-junk-fee-price-transparency-law/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-junk-fee-price-transparency-law/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s all-in pricing law lives in § 325D.44, subd. 1a — inside the one consumer statute whose only remedy is an injunction. Where the money claim actually comes from.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Retaliation Presumption Applies to One Kind of Eviction — and It Is Not the Kind Most Tenants Face</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-landlord-retaliation-504b-285/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-landlord-retaliation-504b-285/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.285, subd. 2, shifts the burden to the landlord inside 90 days. But by its own words it reaches only a tenancy terminated by notice to quit. Where Minnesota&apos;s real retaliation law lives now.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s No-Fault Act Doesn&apos;t Just Leave Motorcyclists Out. It Declares That a Car Didn&apos;t Injure Them — Even When a Car Did.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-motorcycle-crash-no-fault-gap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-motorcycle-crash-no-fault-gap/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 65B.46, subd. 3 deems a rider&apos;s injuries not to arise from the use of a motor vehicle &apos;although a motor vehicle is involved in the accident.&apos; That one sentence is why there is no PIP, why the tort threshold is an open question, and why your auto policy&apos;s UIM may not follow you onto your own bike.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Guardian Clause in Your Minnesota Will Can Take Effect While You Are Still Alive</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-naming-a-guardian-for-minor-children/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-naming-a-guardian-for-minor-children/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.5-202 makes a parental appointment effective on death, an adjudication of incapacity, or a physician&apos;s written determination — whichever comes first. And a one-page objection can end it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Pay Transparency Law Tells Employers What to Publish and Says Nothing About What Happens If They Don&apos;t</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pay-transparency-181-173/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pay-transparency-181-173/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.173 requires a starting salary range in every job posting by a 30-employee Minnesota employer. The legislature left it off the commissioner&apos;s compliance-order list in § 177.27 and off the private-action list in § 181.171 — in the same act.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Three-Year Probate Deadline Does Not Take Away Anyone&apos;s Title. It Takes Away the Will.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-probate-time-limits-524-3-108/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-probate-time-limits-524-3-108/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.3-108 bars probate and appointment proceedings three years after death — but property already devolved at death, and the determination-of-descent route only becomes available once the three years have run.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Cannot Lien a Public Project in Minnesota — Here Is What You Do Instead</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-project-payment-bond-574-26/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-project-payment-bond-574-26/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s Public Contractors&apos; Performance and Payment Bond Act replaces the mechanic&apos;s lien on public work. The payment bond claim runs on a 120-day notice and a one-year suit deadline.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Do-Not-Call Law Expired in 2012. Here Is What Actually Governs Robocalls to a Minnesota Number.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-robocall-telemarketing-law-325e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-robocall-telemarketing-law-325e/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 325E.311–.316 — the state no-call registry and its caller-ID provision — expired December 31, 2012. What survives, what replaced it, and where the private remedy is.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Salary History Ban Is a Civil Rights Law, Not a Wage Law</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-salary-history-ban/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-salary-history-ban/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s pay-history inquiry ban sits inside the Human Rights Act — which means a one-employee threshold, a one-year clock, treble damages, and a mandatory penalty paid to the state.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota, a Lawsuit Starts When You Serve It — Not When You File It. Almost Everything That Goes Wrong Follows From That.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-service-of-process-rule-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-service-of-process-rule-4/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 3.01 commences an action by service. That single design choice creates the traps that end Minnesota cases: no service by mail, a &apos;usual place of abode&apos; that is a fact question, publication grounds that must actually be true, and a one-year filing clock that dismisses with prejudice without a motion.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Slayer Statute Does Not Disinherit the Killer&apos;s Family — It Moves the Killer Out of the Line</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-slayer-statute-524-2-803/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-slayer-statute-524-2-803/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-803 passes the estate &apos;as if the killer had predeceased the decedent.&apos; That is a rule of substitution, not forfeiture — and it means the killer&apos;s own children can take the share the killer lost.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Snowmobile and ATV Crashes in Minnesota: Where the Insurance Isn&apos;t, and What the Legislature Quietly Changed in 2024</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-snowmobile-atv-accident-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-snowmobile-atv-accident-claims/</guid><description>No-fault does not reach snowmobiles or ATVs, no statute requires anyone to insure one, and no auto UM coverage is owed — but a 2024 amendment to § 169.09 may have just made the machine&apos;s owner liable for the friend who was driving it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>What Actually Stops a Minnesota Limitations Clock — and Why Ignorance Is Not on the List</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-statute-of-limitations-tolling-541-15/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-statute-of-limitations-tolling-541-15/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 541.15 suspends the clock for four disabilities, but only for the person who has one. Minnesota has no general discovery rule, and the doctrine most litigants call tolling is really estoppel — which carries a due-diligence requirement tolling does not.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Surface-Water Drainage Disputes: The Reasonable-Use Rule Cuts Both Ways</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-surface-water-drainage-disputes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-surface-water-drainage-disputes/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s reasonable-use rule is symmetric. The neighbor who berms, plugs, or fills to keep water out is exposed on the same four factors as the neighbor who ditches it downhill.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Does Minnesota Have an Anti-SLAPP Law? The Seven-Year Hole and What Closed It</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-anti-slapp-upepa-554/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-anti-slapp-upepa-554/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s anti-SLAPP statute was struck down in 2017 and left dead until May 25, 2024. What Leiendecker actually held, what UPEPA restored, and the two remedies the legislature did not bring back.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Benefit Corporations: What Chapter 304A Actually Does</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-benefit-corporations-304a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-benefit-corporations-304a/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s public benefit corporation statute does not require a company to do any good. It removes the liability for doing good — and gives almost no one the power to enforce it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Modifying Minnesota Child Support: The Money Starts Running the Day You Serve, and the Equitable Escape Hatch Was Repealed in 2007</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-child-support-modification-518a39/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-child-support-modification-518a39/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 518A.39, subd. 2(f) makes a support modification retroactive only to the date the motion was served. The four exceptions the Supreme Court applied in Gully are gone, and since 2024 the section no longer governs spousal maintenance at all.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Tells Unmarried Couples to Get It in Writing. In Both Supreme Court Cases on the Statute, the Partner Who Won Had Nothing in Writing.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-cohabitation-agreements-513-075/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-cohabitation-agreements-513-075/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 513.075 and 513.076 bar a cohabitant&apos;s property claim without a signed writing — but only where cohabitation is the sole consideration. Eriksen, Palmen, and Obert define the exception, and § 513.075 has a second requirement almost nobody reads.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Consumer Data Privacy Act Exempts Small Businesses — and Then Regulates Them Anyway</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-data-privacy-act-325m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-data-privacy-act-325m/</guid><description>The MCDPA is codified at Minn. Stat. §§ 325M.10–.21, not in a chapter of its own. Its 21 exclusions are where the surprises live: the small-business exemption carries a carve-back with no size threshold, and there is no general exemption for nonprofits.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota DWI Forfeiture Has Two 60-Day Clocks, and They Go to Different Places. Filing the Wrong One Is the Same as Filing Nothing.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dwi-vehicle-forfeiture-169a63/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dwi-vehicle-forfeiture-169a63/</guid><description>Since January 1, 2022, the owner who was not driving does not file a lawsuit — she writes a letter to the prosecutor, and the State then has 30 days to sue her. Minn. Stat. § 169A.63 after Olson v. One 1999 Lexus.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Electronic Signature Law: Your E-Signed Contract Is Binding. Your E-Signed Will Is Worthless.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-electronic-signatures-325l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-electronic-signatures-325l/</guid><description>How Minn. Stat. ch. 325L makes emails, DocuSigns, and typed names legally binding signatures — and the short list of documents Minnesota still requires on paper.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Banned Noncompetes and Left Employment NDAs Almost Entirely Alone. The Limits That Exist Are Federal, and Narrower Than People Think.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-employment-nda-limits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-employment-nda-limits/</guid><description>The word &apos;nondisparagement&apos; does not appear anywhere in the Minnesota Statutes. The Speak Out Act reaches only clauses signed before the dispute arose. The most useful Minnesota provision is a 15-day rescission right in the Human Rights Act that most severance packets never mention.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Says a Filed Out-of-State Judgment Gets &apos;the Same Defenses&apos; as a Minnesota One. The Supreme Court Calls That a Misconception.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-enforcing-out-of-state-judgments-548-26/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-enforcing-out-of-state-judgments-548-26/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 548.27 makes a foreign judgment subject to the same procedures and defenses as a Minnesota judgment. Matson v. Matson holds that Rule 60.02 does not apply the same way — the grounds are a closed list, the merits are off the table, and the case was usually won or lost in the rendering state.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Bans Gift Card Expiration Dates Outright. The Federal Rule That Allows Them Is the One That Covers Your Emailed Gift Code.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-gift-card-law-325g53/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-gift-card-law-325g53/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325G.53 forbids any expiration date or fee on a gift certificate — but I read its &apos;tangible record&apos; definition, six carve-outs, and the one appellate case on it as the whole ballgame.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has No Next-of-Kin Rule. Without a Health Care Directive, the Answer Is a Guardianship Petition.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-health-care-directive-145c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-health-care-directive-145c/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 145C.10(e) creates no presumption for anyone who never signed a directive. And the chapter is asymmetric: a direction to provide life-sustaining care carries a statutory duty; a direction to stop carries only immunity.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Contractor Recovery Fund Does Not Cover Unlicensed Contractors. That Is the Whole Point of It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-hiring-a-contractor-recovery-fund/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-hiring-a-contractor-recovery-fund/</guid><description>The $100,000 backstop in Minn. Stat. § 326B.89 requires a final judgment against a licensed contractor. Hire someone unlicensed and you lose it, along with the written-contract rule and the insurance requirement — but § 514.02 runs the other way.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Rewrote HOA Law in 2026 — and Whether It Reaches Your Association Depends on What Kind of Community You Live In, Not How Old It Is</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-hoa-owner-rights-515b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-hoa-owner-rights-515b/</guid><description>Owner rights under MCIOA beyond assessments: records, meetings, voting, fines, amendments by silence, and the 2026 amendments that take effect January 1, 2027.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota, Your Co-Owner Can Destroy Your Survivorship Alone — but Your Creditor Cannot</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-joint-tenancy-vs-tenancy-in-common/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-joint-tenancy-vs-tenancy-in-common/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 500.19, subd. 5 lets one joint tenant sever a joint tenancy by recording a single instrument, and § 507.02 exempts that severance from the rule requiring both spouses to sign anything touching the homestead. A judgment creditor gets no such power.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Breaks and Overtime After January 1, 2026: Hard Numbers, Real Damages, and a 48-Hour Rule That Rarely Applies</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-meal-rest-breaks-overtime-177/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-meal-rest-breaks-overtime-177/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s break law got teeth on January 1, 2026 — 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and liquidated damages. Its 48-hour overtime rule did not change, and usually is not the one that governs.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has No Pet Custody Statute. The Words &apos;Care, Possession, or Control&apos; of a Dog Are in the Domestic Abuse Act, Not the Divorce Chapter.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pets-in-divorce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pets-in-divorce/</guid><description>Chapter 518 contains no companion-animal provision — the dog is personal property divided under § 518.58, and § 518.582 is about pensions. But Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subds. 6(a)(14) and 7(a)(6) have let a court direct a pet&apos;s care and possession, ex parte, since 2010.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Pierringer Release Is Not a Discount Off the Verdict. It Is the Sale of a Slice of the Cause of Action, and That Distinction Decides Who Eats the Uncollectible Share.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pierringer-releases/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pierringer-releases/</guid><description>Frey v. Snelgrove confirmed the Pierringer release was already Minnesota practice and set the procedure. What it did not do is make settlement money a credit — and the indemnity clause the plaintiff signs can take money back out of the judgment years later.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Purchase Agreement Cancellation Statute Is Not About Cancellation. It Is About Who Keeps the Earnest Money.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-purchase-agreement-cancellation-559-217/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-purchase-agreement-cancellation-559-217/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 559.217 is permissive — a purchase agreement that cancels by its own terms is already dead. What the statute actually does is decide the deposit, on a first-to-serve basis, and § 82.75 makes it the only way most brokers can release it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Stepparent Adoption Terminates a Parent. Section 259.24 Gives You Only Three Ways In.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-stepparent-adoption-259/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-stepparent-adoption-259/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 259.24, subd. 1, gives three ways past a parent who will not consent — and the six-month abandonment presumption is switched off in exactly the case where stepparent adoptions arise.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Gives Student Loan Borrowers $500 Per Violation and Attorney Fees. Sue Without Sending One Certified Letter First and You Get Nothing.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-student-loan-borrower-rights-58b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-student-loan-borrower-rights-58b/</guid><description>Chapter 58B&apos;s private right of action is in § 58B.09, subd. 4 — not where most people look. Its 45-day notice and 30-day cure provisions are conditions on the claim, and they are why the class action is the enforcement vehicle.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Handwritten List That Legally Disposes of Your Belongings</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tangible-personal-property-list-524-2-513/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tangible-personal-property-list-524-2-513/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-513 lets an unwitnessed, freely revisable list control who gets your tangible personal property — if your will says one sentence and you respect three exclusions.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Unused PTO at Separation in Minnesota: Why “Wages Actually Earned” Does Not Get You Paid</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unused-pto-payout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unused-pto-payout/</guid><description>Minnesota has no statute requiring a vacation or PTO payout. The Supreme Court held § 181.13 is a timing statute — so the employer&apos;s own documents decide the case.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Used-Car Warranty Runs Backwards: The Oldest, Cheapest, Highest-Mileage Cars Are the Ones the Statute Protects</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-used-car-warranty-325f662/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-used-car-warranty-325f662/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325F.662 gives a car with 150,000 miles a warranty the same car would not get at 60,000 miles — and exempts franchised new-car dealers from the tier that covers it. The warranty also exists whether or not the dealer wrote one.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota City Has More Room to Rezone Your Whole Neighborhood Than to Deny You One Conditional Use Permit</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-zoning-variances-cup-462-357/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-zoning-variances-cup-462-357/</guid><description>Variances, conditional use permits, the 60-day rule of Minn. Stat. § 15.99, and why the forum for judicial review turns on whether a city or a county said no.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Ancillary Probate in Minnesota: The Out-of-State Decedent Who Owned Minnesota Land</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ancillary-probate-out-of-state/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ancillary-probate-out-of-state/</guid><description>Minnesota real estate in a nonresident&apos;s estate does not always require a Minnesota probate. Chapter 524, article 4 gives the out-of-state personal representative a route around it — one that any Minnesota creditor can shut down in 60 days.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Certificates of Assumed Name: The $30 Filing That Can Stop Your Lawsuit Cold</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assumed-name-333/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assumed-name-333/</guid><description>Skipping the ch. 333 assumed-name filing does not void your contracts. It stays your lawsuit until you file — and hands the other side $250 in costs whether they win or lose.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Hit While Walking or Riding: Minnesota Bicycle and Pedestrian Crash Claims</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-bicycle-pedestrian-crash-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-bicycle-pedestrian-crash-claims/</guid><description>Two Minnesota rules decide these cases and almost nobody knows them: no traffic violation in chapter 169 is negligence per se, and a cyclist who rolls a stop sign with no car in the vicinity has broken no law at all.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Partition Fence Law Quietly Stopped Applying to Most Neighbors in 2017</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-boundary-fences-344/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-boundary-fences-344/</guid><description>Chapter 344 makes adjoining landowners split the cost of a boundary fence — but since May 31, 2017, only where both parcels are used to produce or maintain livestock. The leading cases construe a trigger the Legislature deleted.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Breaking a Lease Early in Minnesota: The Four Statutory Exits — and the 2024 Statute That Matters More Than All of Them</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-breaking-a-lease-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-breaking-a-lease-early/</guid><description>Minnesota gives tenants four express termination rights, and since August 1, 2024, a non-waivable duty-to-mitigate statute that can end the lease outright when a landlord sits on an empty unit.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Jury Duty, Voting, School Conferences: Minnesota&apos;s Civic Leave Statutes</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civic-leave-jury-voting-school/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civic-leave-jury-voting-school/</guid><description>Seven Minnesota leaves that have nothing to do with illness — what each one costs an employer, and why the remedy is almost always narrower than the duty.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Suing Someone Who Hit You: Minnesota Civil Assault and Battery</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-assault-battery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-assault-battery/</guid><description>The elements are easy and the conviction is often already in hand. What actually decides these cases is a two-year clock with a six-year exception, and an insurance exclusion built to defeat exactly this claim.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Civil Contempt in Minnesota: How Courts Make People Obey Orders</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-contempt-588/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-contempt-588/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s contempt power under chapter 588 — the civil/criminal line, the Hopp requirements, purge conditions, and why you cannot jail a judgment debtor.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Refusing an Inheritance in Minnesota: No Deadline, One Absolute Bar</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-disclaiming-inheritance-524-2-1106/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-disclaiming-inheritance-524-2-1106/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act has no time limit — the nine-month clock is federal tax law. But Minn. Stat. § 524.2-1106(b)(4) bars an insolvent disclaimant outright, and no federally qualified disclaimer gets around it.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Dividing Retirement in a Minnesota Divorce: Why the Decree Alone Moves No Money</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dividing-retirement-qdro-divorce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dividing-retirement-qdro-divorce/</guid><description>QDROs for ERISA plans, § 408(d)(6) transfers for IRAs, and what Minn. Stat. §§ 518.58 and 518.581 do for public pensions — plus the 18-month federal clock that ends with the money back in the participant&apos;s account.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Medical Debt Law After the Debt Fairness Act: What Actually Changed, and What Is Now in Federal Crosshairs</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-debt-fairness-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-debt-fairness-act/</guid><description>The 2024 Debt Fairness Act ended spousal liability for medical bills, banned medical debt credit reporting, and created a one-way fee shift for debtors who win. A precise look at ch. 332C — including what &apos;medical debt&apos; excludes.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Changing Your Name in Minnesota: Four Statutes, Four Very Different Prices</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-name-change-259/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-name-change-259/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 259.10–.14 govern legal name changes — plus § 518.27 and § 517.08. Two of the routes are free by statute, one carries a criminal-history report to the BCA, and a felony conviction changes everything.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Negligent Security in Minnesota: When a Business Answers for Someone Else&apos;s Attack</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-negligent-security-premises/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-negligent-security-premises/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s premises duty is a duty to deter crime, not to prevent it. And after the supreme court&apos;s January 2026 decision in Glay v. R.C. of St. Cloud, the defense that used to end these cases is off the table.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Running a Minnesota Nonprofit: What Chapter 317A Actually Requires — and the Three Things It Does Not Do</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nonprofit-317a-basics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nonprofit-317a-basics/</guid><description>Minnesota nonprofit corporations don&apos;t have to be charitable, their directors are not trustees, and the volunteer-immunity statute has a hole exactly where the risk is. A practitioner&apos;s walk through ch. 317A, ch. 309, and ch. 501B.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>What Minnesota Corporate Directors and Officers Actually Owe: § 302A.251, § 302A.361, and the Rule That Isn&apos;t in the Statute</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-officer-director-duties-302a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-officer-director-duties-302a/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s director standard-of-conduct statute never mentions the business judgment rule. Here is what § 302A.251 does say, what the 2025 officer amendment changed, and where the real protection comes from.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>April 30 Is Not the Deadline That Kills Minnesota Property Tax Appeals</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-property-tax-appeal-278/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-property-tax-appeal-278/</guid><description>Chapter 278 petitions rarely die on the filing deadline. They die on May 16, on August 1, and on a one-way door in the Tax Court&apos;s Small Claims Division that closes 30 days after you walk through it.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Statute Out-of-State Manufacturers Forget: Minn. Stat. § 325E.37</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-sales-representative-act-325e37/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-sales-representative-act-325e37/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s Termination of Sales Representatives Act does not make a rep un-fireable. It makes the manufacturer use a door it did not write into the contract — and it voids the out-of-state choice-of-law clause it relied on.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Special Assessment Is Capped by What the Project Did to Your Market Value — and Most Are Lost Before the Hearing Ends</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-special-assessment-appeals-429/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-special-assessment-appeals-429/</guid><description>Chapter 429 assessments are limited by the increase in market value the improvement produced. But the assessment roll is prima facie proof the city got it right, and a signed written objection at the hearing is what preserves the fight.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Summary Dissolution: The Fast Divorce Almost Nobody Qualifies For</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-summary-dissolution-518-195/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-summary-dissolution-518-195/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 518.195 lets a court administrator enter a divorce decree without a judge — but eight criteria frozen since 1997 disqualify nearly everyone, and the alternative is usually just as fast.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Tip Law After the 2024 Changes: The Swipe Fee, the Service Charge, and Who Owns the Money</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tips-gratuities-177-24/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tips-gratuities-177-24/</guid><description>Since August 1, 2024 a Minnesota employer must hand over the full credit-card tip with no deduction for processing. And a mandatory service charge is legally a gratuity unless the customer got notice in the right type size.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Neighbor Cut Your Trees: Minnesota&apos;s Treble Damages Statute Triples a Number That Is Often Zero</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tree-damage-treble-561-04/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tree-damage-treble-561-04/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 561.04 trebles tree-trespass damages almost automatically. The fight is never about the multiplier — it is about the number being multiplied, and Minnesota&apos;s default measure of tree damage is the diminution in the value of the land.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Unpaid Commissions After Termination: Minnesota&apos;s § 181.145 Is Not an Employee Statute</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unpaid-commissions-181-145/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unpaid-commissions-181-145/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.145 pays commission salespeople fast and penalizes employers who stall — but it covers independent contractors, not employees, and the penalty clock runs out four years before the contract clock does.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has No Total-Loss Threshold. The 80 Percent Rule Governs Your Title, Not Your Settlement.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-auto-total-loss-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-auto-total-loss-claims/</guid><description>The 80 percent figure in Minnesota law is a title-branding trigger under ch. 168A. The statute that governs what your insurer must pay for a totaled car is § 72A.201, subd. 6 — and Morris holds you cannot sue to enforce it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Civil Conspiracy and Aiding-and-Abetting in Minnesota: Reaching the People Around the Wrongdoer</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-conspiracy-aiding-abetting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-civil-conspiracy-aiding-abetting/</guid><description>Minnesota has held since 1950 that there is no civil action for conspiracy. So why plead it? Because of what it does to joint and several liability under § 604.02.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has Four Construction Prompt-Payment Regimes. The Private One Does Not Make the Owner Pay You.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-prompt-payment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-prompt-payment/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 337.10 is a pass-through statute with a 5% retainage cap and a mandatory fee shift. What it obligates, who is excluded, and how public projects work differently — including the new § 15.72 payment-transparency rule.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Conversion and Civil Theft in Minnesota: Why § 604.14 Is Not a Civil Version of the Criminal Theft Statute</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-conversion-civil-theft-604-14/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-conversion-civil-theft-604-14/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.14 can double a recovery for stolen property — but the word &apos;steals&apos; has been read narrowly, there is no fee-shifting, and the independent-duty rule kills most business claims.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Criminal Expungement After Clean Slate: Why Automatic Sealing Is Not the Same as a Court Order</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-criminal-expungement-609a-clean-slate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-criminal-expungement-609a-clean-slate/</guid><description>Minnesota has automatically sealed nearly 1.9 million records. An automatic grant is still weaker than a petitioned order in three specific ways.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Defamation Law: What the New Anti-SLAPP Act Changed, and What It Didn&apos;t</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-defamation-law-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-defamation-law-guide/</guid><description>Minnesota had no working anti-SLAPP statute from 2017 to 2024. UPEPA rebuilt it — and three published decisions already show it is narrower than defendants expect.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When a Minnesota Employee Handbook Becomes a Contract — and Why the Disclaimer May Not Save You</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-employee-handbook-as-contract/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-employee-handbook-as-contract/</guid><description>Minnesota reads a handbook provision by provision. In 2021 the Supreme Court held a general &apos;this is not a contract&apos; disclaimer was ambiguous and sent the question to a fact-finder.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Eviction Expungement: The Test Most People Still Cite Was Repealed in 2023</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-eviction-expungement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-eviction-expungement/</guid><description>Minnesota tenants no longer have to prove the landlord&apos;s case was baseless. Here is what §484.014 requires now, and what expungement does to screening reports.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation in Minnesota: Why the Elements Are the Easy Part</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-fraud-misrepresentation-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-fraud-misrepresentation-claims/</guid><description>Minnesota measures fraud damages by out-of-pocket loss, not benefit of the bargain — and the negligence version of the claim usually is not available in an arm&apos;s-length deal.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Recognition of Parentage Makes You a Father and Gives You Nothing. The Statute Says So in Large Print.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parentage-act-257/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parentage-act-257/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 257.75, subd. 3, an ROP has the force of a parentage judgment — and the mother keeps sole custody until a court says otherwise. The adjudicated father is in a better procedural position than the one who signed at the hospital.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Pet Trusts: What § 501C.0408 Actually Lets You Do for Your Dog</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pet-trusts-501c-0408/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pet-trusts-501c-0408/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0408 makes a trust for an animal enforceable — and lets a court cut the funding if you leave too much. The drafting choices decide which happens.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Quiet Title Statute Is One Sentence Long — and That Sentence Decides Whether You Can Sue at All</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-quiet-title-559-01/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-quiet-title-559-01/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 559.01 lets you clear an adverse claim only if you are in possession or the land is vacant. What the statute grants, what it does not reach, and why registered land runs on a different track.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You May Already Be in a General Partnership: Minnesota&apos;s Accidental Partnership Problem</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-accidental-partnership-323a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-accidental-partnership-323a/</guid><description>Minnesota forms a partnership &quot;whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership&quot; — no filing, no agreement, and every partner personally liable for everything the business owes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Modifying Custody in Minnesota: The Time Bars Are Softer Than You Think and the Hearing Is Harder to Get</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-custody-modification-518-18/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-custody-modification-518-18/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 518.18 imposes a one-year bar after the decree and a two-year bar after a prior motion — both with exceptions. The real chokepoint is Nice-Petersen and Goldman: no evidentiary hearing at all unless the affidavits alone make out four elements.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Dissenters&apos; Rights: The Deadlines Are Short and the Remedy Is Exclusive</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dissenters-rights-302a-471/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dissenters-rights-302a-471/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. §§ 302A.471 and 302A.473, a shareholder must object before the vote, demand within 30 days, and demand again within 30 days of the check — and cannot undo the deal absent fraud.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>E-Bike and Scooter Crashes in a No-Fault System Built for Cars</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ebike-escooter-crash-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ebike-escooter-crash-claims/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s no-fault law never planned for e-bikes and rental scooters. The result is strange: struck by a car, a rider is often better insured than a motorcyclist.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Grandparent Visitation and Third-Party Custody in Minnesota: Chapter 257C</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-grandparent-third-party-custody-257c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-grandparent-third-party-custody-257c/</guid><description>The statute on the page is not the law that applies — a Minnesota Supreme Court decision struck one subdivision and rewrote the burden of proof. I walk through where these cases are actually won and lost.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Suing Your Insurance Agent in Minnesota: Why Duty, Not Negligence, Decides the Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insurance-agent-negligence-failure-to-procure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insurance-agent-negligence-failure-to-procure/</guid><description>A Minnesota jury can find your agent knew you were relying on him, knew you needed the coverage, and was 80% at fault — and you still lose. Failure to procure and the special-circumstances exception.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota, 24 Hours&apos; Notice Is the Floor — and Every Improper Entry Is Its Own $500</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-landlord-entry-tenant-privacy-504b-211/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-landlord-entry-tenant-privacy-504b-211/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.211 requires a reasonable business purpose, not less than 24 hours&apos; notice, a stated time window, and entry between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Subdivision 6 attaches a per-violation penalty, rescission, and fees.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Liability Waivers: Why &quot;Any and All Claims&quot; No Longer Bars a Negligence Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-liability-waivers-exculpatory-clauses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-liability-waivers-exculpatory-clauses/</guid><description>Minnesota enforces liability waivers — but only if the release actually says the business is off the hook for its own negligence. A practitioner&apos;s guide to exculpatory clauses after Justice v. Marvel.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Life Insurance Beneficiary Disputes: Why the Answer Depends on Who Issued the Policy</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-life-insurance-beneficiary-disputes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-life-insurance-beneficiary-disputes/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s revocation-on-divorce and slayer statutes are state law — and state law is exactly what ERISA and FEGLIA preempt. Same facts, three different outcomes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Marital vs. Nonmarital Property in Minnesota: The Statute Protects Appreciation and the Case Law Takes Some of It Back</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-marital-vs-nonmarital-property/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-marital-vs-nonmarital-property/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 518.003, subd. 3b says the increase in value of nonmarital property is nonmarital. Nardini, Antone, and Baker read a marital-effort exception into that text — and the one nonmarital shelter § 518.58 cannot invade is not the one most clients assume.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Minnesota: A Narrow Door Into a Wider Room</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-negligent-infliction-emotional-distress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-negligent-infliction-emotional-distress/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s zone-of-danger rule decides who can bring an NIED claim, not what they can recover. A practitioner&apos;s guide to Engler, Stadler, K.A.C., and the three ways emotional distress becomes compensable.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Order for Protection or Harassment Restraining Order? Choosing the Right One in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-order-for-protection-vs-hro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-order-for-protection-vs-hro/</guid><description>The OFP/HRO choice is decided by the relationship, not the severity of the conduct — and it controls firearms, custody, and every other remedy available.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Moving Out of State With a Child in Minnesota: Three Ways § 518.175, Subd. 3 Does Not Apply</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parental-relocation-518-175/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parental-relocation-518-175/</guid><description>The relocation statute governs only an out-of-state move, only by the parent the child lives with, and only where the decree has no locale restriction. Miss one and the motion is governed by § 518.18&apos;s endangerment standard instead — and the burden allocation usually decides the rest.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Promissory Estoppel in Minnesota: An Equitable Claim, Not a Consideration Substitute</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-promissory-estoppel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-promissory-estoppel/</guid><description>Minnesota calls promissory estoppel equitable — which usually means no jury, a judge deciding &quot;injustice&quot; as a policy question, and a remedy that can be cut to what you actually lost.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Who Controls a Body in Minnesota? The Right of Disposition Under § 149A.80</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-right-of-disposition-149a80/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-right-of-disposition-149a80/</guid><description>Not your executor, not your agent under a power of attorney, and not necessarily your family. A twelve-rung statutory ladder decides — and it decides fast.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Child Victims Act: How the Theory You Plead Decides Whether There Is a Deadline at All</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-sexual-abuse-civil-statute-541-073/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-sexual-abuse-civil-statute-541-073/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 541.073 sets different limitations rules for perpetrators, negligent institutions, and vicarious liability claims. A close reading of the current statute text and the 2013 amendments.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Spousal Maintenance After the 2024 Rewrite: The Tie No Longer Goes to the Recipient</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-spousal-maintenance-518-552/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-spousal-maintenance-518-552/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 518.552 once told courts to award permanent maintenance whenever the need was uncertain. Since August 1, 2024, three rebuttable presumptions keyed to the length of the marriage decide duration instead — and the modification standard is no longer where practitioners look for it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>&quot;Never Make a Payment on an Old Debt&quot; Is Good Advice for the Wrong Reason in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-time-barred-debt-acknowledgment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-time-barred-debt-acknowledgment/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 541.053, effective August 1, 2013, provides that an expired consumer-debt limitations period &quot;is not revived by the collection of a payment on an account, a discharge in a bankruptcy proceeding, or an oral or written reaffirmation of the debt.&quot;</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Tortious Interference Claim Is a Fee-Shifting Device — and the Cheapest Defense to It Cost Forty-Two Minutes of a Lawyer&apos;s Time</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tortious-interference-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tortious-interference-claims/</guid><description>Kallok v. Medtronic lets a plaintiff recover the attorney fees of the underlying contract suit as damages from the interferer. Sysdyne Corp. v. Rousslang lets a defendant defeat the same claim by reasonably relying on incorrect advice of counsel.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Truth in Repairs Act Used to Stop at $7,500. In 2024 the Legislature Deleted the Ceiling.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-truth-in-repairs-act-325f56/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-truth-in-repairs-act-325f56/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 325F.56–.66 govern auto, appliance, and dwelling repairs. Laws 2024, ch. 114, art. 3, § 48 struck the upper dollar limit — the big-ticket engine job is now inside the Act, with treble punitive damages available under § 325F.63.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit in Minnesota: A Gap-Filler, Not a Fairness Override</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unjust-enrichment-quantum-meruit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unjust-enrichment-quantum-meruit/</guid><description>In Minnesota, &quot;unjust&quot; means closer to unlawful than to unfair — and a legal remedy you had but never used will defeat the claim. What actually has to be pleaded and proved.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Wells and Septic at a Minnesota Closing: One Disclosure Stops the Deed, the Other Does Not</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-well-and-septic-disclosure-at-closing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-well-and-septic-disclosure-at-closing/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s well disclosure certificate can block a county recorder from accepting your deed. The septic disclosure cannot — and the statute says so in as many words.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Termination-Reason Letter Under Minn. Stat. § 181.933</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-termination-reason-letter-181-933/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-termination-reason-letter-181-933/</guid><description>A fired Minnesota employee has 15 working days to demand the truthful reason for the termination in writing — and the employer has ten working days to answer.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Seven Proofs a Debt Buyer Owes the Court Before a Default Judgment</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-debt-buyer-judgments-548-101/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-debt-buyer-judgments-548-101/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 548.101 makes a debt buyer prove its case even when nobody shows up — seven evidentiary items, and a missing one is grounds to attack the judgment.</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Foreclosure by Action: The Minnesota Foreclosure Nobody Writes About, and Why Lenders Quietly Choose It</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mortgage-foreclosure-by-action-581/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mortgage-foreclosure-by-action-581/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 581 lets a mortgagee foreclose through a lawsuit instead of a sheriff&apos;s advertisement. The chapter is twelve sections long, and the reason to use it lives in § 582.30: the deficiency judgment.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Setting That Overrides Your Will: Digital Assets and Fiduciary Access Under Minnesota Chapter 521A</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-digital-assets-fiduciary-access-521a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-digital-assets-fiduciary-access-521a/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. ch. 521A, a custodian&apos;s online tool beats your will, your will beats the terms of service, and without express consent your executor gets the envelope information — never the letters.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>What a Severance Release Can and Cannot Buy in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-severance-release-agreements/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-severance-release-agreements/</guid><description>Minnesota severance releases carry a 15-day rescission right, a federal 21-day clock for workers 40+, and a list of claims no employer can purchase at any price.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Conciliation Court, Start to Finish: The $20,000 Court Nobody Briefs</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-conciliation-court-491a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-conciliation-court-491a/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s conciliation court now hears claims up to $20,000. Filing, service, trial, the 21-day removal window, and turning the judgment into money.</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s New-Home Warranty Lasts Ten Years. The Letter That Preserves It Is Due in Six Months.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-new-home-warranties-327a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-new-home-warranties-327a/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 327A gives every new-home buyer 1-, 2-, and 10-year statutory warranties the builder cannot waive. Sixteen exclusions, a six-month written-notice rule, and a mandatory repair process decide who actually collects.</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Payday Loan Cap Is 50 Percent APR With Nothing Added. As of August 1, 2026, It Also Reaches the Company That Merely Arranged the Loan.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-small-loans-47-60/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-small-loans-47-60/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 47.60 caps a consumer small loan at $350, 30 days, and an APR of 50 percent that includes every fee. A 2026 amendment extended the definition of lender to anyone arranging the loan — and the Revisor&apos;s codified display does not yet show it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Bars LLCs and Trusts From Owning Farmland. The General Partnership Is Exempt.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-corporate-farming-law-500-24/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-corporate-farming-law-500-24/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 500.24 prohibits corporations, LLCs, trusts, limited partnerships, and pension or investment funds from farming or owning agricultural land — unless the entity fits one of twenty enumerated definitions, has a conservation plan, and files an annual report. General partnerships are outside the subdivision entirely.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Racial Covenant in a Minnesota Chain of Title Is Already Void — So What Does Recording the Discharge Form Actually Do?</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-discriminatory-covenant-discharge-507-18/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-discriminatory-covenant-discharge-507-18/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 507.18, subd. 2 voids the covenant regardless of the year the instrument was executed. The free statutory form in subdivisions 5 and 6 is a title record, not a change in the legal effect — and by its own terms it is unavailable on Torrens property.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Student&apos;s Record Rights Do Not Wait for the Eighteenth Birthday</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-educational-data-13-32/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-educational-data-13-32/</guid><description>Under 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(d), FERPA rights pass to the student at 18 or on attending a postsecondary institution — whichever comes first. Minn. Stat. § 13.32 then supplies nineteen clauses of permitted disclosure, a parent veto over juvenile justice requests, and a ban on monitoring school-issued devices.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Condemnation Pays for More Than the Land — but Clearing the 40 Percent Attorney-Fee Threshold Does Not Get You Your Bill</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-eminent-domain-minimum-compensation-117/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-eminent-domain-minimum-compensation-117/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 117.031(a) compares the final award to the condemning authority&apos;s last written offer, not to its appraisal, and the Minnesota Supreme Court has held the 40 percent figure is a minimum eligibility threshold with the amount set by lodestar. Sections 117.186 and 117.187 add going-concern and minimum-compensation damages, each on its own conditions.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Garnishment Does Not Order Anyone to Pay You. Chapter 551 Is How the Money Moves.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-execution-levy-chapter-551/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-execution-levy-chapter-551/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 571.72, subd. 2, cl. (5), a garnishee retains the debtor&apos;s money until a writ of execution is served. Chapter 551 — attorney&apos;s summary execution — is the step that converts a freeze into a payment, and it has its own caps, notices, and void-on-failure rules.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Genetic Testing Statute Reaches Every Employer — but a Narrower Set of Information Than Federal GINA</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-genetic-testing-employment-181-974/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-genetic-testing-employment-181-974/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.974 has no employer-size threshold, no agency to exhaust, and a treble-damages private action. It also protects less information than GINA does, and it has no exceptions at all.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When a Door-to-Door Seller Never Gives the Cancellation Notice, Minnesota&apos;s Statute Does Not Say the Clock Stops. It Says Something Narrower.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-home-solicitation-sales-cancellation-325g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-home-solicitation-sales-cancellation-325g/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 325G.06–.11 give a three-business-day right to cancel a home solicitation sale. The sentence governing a seller who never gave notice is in § 325G.08, subd. 2 — and I read it as answering how the buyer may cancel, not, in terms, the deadline.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Invasion of Privacy Tort: What Lake v. Wal-Mart Created, What It Refused, and What Later Cases Took Back</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-invasion-of-privacy-tort/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-invasion-of-privacy-tort/</guid><description>Minnesota recognized no common-law privacy tort until 1998. Lake v. Wal-Mart adopted three branches and refused a fourth — and it decided nothing about the elements, which later cases have mostly narrowed.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Manufactured-Home Park Chapter Does Not Replace Landlord-Tenant Law — It Overrides It at Named Points</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-manufactured-home-park-lot-leases-327c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-manufactured-home-park-lot-leases-327c/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 327C gives lot leases seven statutory termination grounds plus park closure, and § 327C.02, subd. 2a, can leave a park owner winning the rule fight and still not getting possession. Chapter 504B keeps applying underneath — I map exactly where.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Naig Settlement Lets an Injured Minnesota Worker Keep Part of a Third-Party Recovery Outright. The Supreme Court Attached a Price to It in the Same Paragraph.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-naig-settlement-subrogation-176-061/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-naig-settlement-subrogation-176-061/</guid><description>Under Naig v. Bloomington Sanitation and Minn. Stat. § 176.061, an injured employee can settle the damages a compensation carrier has no subrogation interest in — on notice, and on proof of what the settlement covers. The opinion says the employee gives up the statutory one-third in exchange.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Polygraph Statute Is Not Really About Polygraphs</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-polygraph-honesty-testing-181-75/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-polygraph-honesty-testing-181-75/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.75 bars an employer from soliciting or requiring &apos;a polygraph, voice stress analysis, or any test purporting to test the honesty&apos; of an employee or applicant — words that are not limited to a machine — and backs it with a misdemeanor, an attorney general injunction, and a private action with fees.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Public Employee Personnel Data in Minnesota: You Cannot Settle It Quietly</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-employee-personnel-data-13-43/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-employee-personnel-data-13-43/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 13.43 makes eight categories of government personnel data public, voids confidentiality terms in public-employment settlements, and applies that rule to court orders too.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Tells Businesses What They May Not Do With a Social Security Number. It Never Says What Happens If They Do It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-social-security-number-restrictions-325e59/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-social-security-number-restrictions-325e59/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325E.59 imposes seven prohibitions on a private business&apos;s use of Social Security numbers plus an affirmative access-control duty — and contains no penalty, damages, or enforcement subdivision at all. The remedy question has to be answered from outside the section.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Lockout Has Its Own Proceeding, and the Court Can Order the Tenant Back In Before the Landlord Is Served</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tenant-lockout-504b375/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tenant-lockout-504b375/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.375 lets a locked-out residential tenant present a verified petition and get an immediate possession order enforced by the sheriff. The section supplies possession, costs, and fees — the damages live in other sections.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Employment Misconduct Under Minn. Stat. § 268.095: The List of Things That Are Not Misconduct</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unemployment-quit-misconduct-268-095/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unemployment-quit-misconduct-268-095/</guid><description>Minnesota defines employment misconduct by statute, then carves ten categories back out of it. Most unemployment denials are won or lost inside that list, not on the appeal deadline.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minn. Stat. § 181.79: The Deduction Authorization Has to Come After the Loss</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wage-deductions-181-79/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wage-deductions-181-79/</guid><description>Minnesota conditions a deduction for a broken tool or a till shortage on a writing the employee signs after the loss occurred — or on a court judgment. Any contrary agreement is void, and the remedy is double.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Sets Workers&apos; Compensation Attorney Fees by Statute. For Nineteen Months the Required Retainer Notice Recited Numbers the Fee Provision No Longer Used — and the Statute Book Still Does.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workers-compensation-attorney-fees-176-081/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workers-compensation-attorney-fees-176-081/</guid><description>In a chapter 176 case the fee is not what my retainer says — it is what Minn. Stat. § 176.081 says: 20 percent of the first $275,000, capped at $55,000 per injury. Laws 2026, ch. 103, § 9 finally conformed the required notice, effective May 19, 2026.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Exclusive Remedy Rule Is One Sentence Long, and the Sentence Immediately After It Is the Escape Hatch</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workers-compensation-exclusive-remedy-176-031/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workers-compensation-exclusive-remedy-176-031/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 176.031 makes workers&apos; compensation the employer&apos;s exclusive liability — then hands the employee of an uninsured employer a choice, and strips that employer of the fellow-servant, assumption-of-risk, and contributory-negligence defenses.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Workers&apos; Compensation Retaliation Statute Contains Two Different Claims, and Only One of Them Reaches a Small Employer</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workers-compensation-retaliation-176-82/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-workers-compensation-retaliation-176-82/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 176.82 holds two claims. Subdivision 1 runs against &apos;any person&apos; and carries fees plus punitive damages up to three times the compensation benefit. Subdivision 2 is a capped one-year-wages claim that never touches an employer with 15 or fewer full-time equivalent employees.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has Two Rules for a Tenant&apos;s Left-Behind Property, and the Same Eviction Can Trigger Either One</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-abandoned-tenant-property-504b271/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-abandoned-tenant-property-504b271/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.271 and § 504B.365, subd. 3, run on different clocks, different sale procedures, and different liability. Which applies turns on how the tenant left and where the property is stored.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Prenup Can Satisfy § 519.11 and Still Not Waive the Spouse&apos;s Rights at Death</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-antenuptial-agreement-519-11/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-antenuptial-agreement-519-11/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 519.11 invites the parties to bar each other of all rights in their respective estates. Minn. Stat. § 524.2-213 construes that exact formula as waiving the elective share alone. Two statutes, two sets of formalities, and one drafting habit that fails both.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Says a Mortgagee Cannot Possess. Then It Carves One Exception — and the Exception Has a Dollar Figure, a Date, and Two Pieces of Paper.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assignment-of-rents-559-17/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assignment-of-rents-559-17/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 559.17 is titled &apos;Mortgage Not a Conveyance; Mortgagee Cannot Possess.&apos; Subdivision 2 is the way around it, and every condition in it is load-bearing.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Notice of Claim Against the State of Minnesota Has Two Addressees, Not One</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-claim-against-the-state-3736/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-claim-against-the-state-3736/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 3.736, subd. 5 requires notice to the attorney general and to every state employee from whom compensation will be sought. Chapter 466 requires one letter to a governing body. That is the smallest difference between the two acts, and the one that ends cases.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Still Allows Confession of Judgment — and § 548.23 Contains the Sentence That Disqualifies Most Cognovit Clauses Before They Are Ever Filed</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-confession-of-judgment-548-22/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-confession-of-judgment-548-22/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 548.22 and § 548.23 authorize judgment without an action. Section 548.23 requires the authorizing instrument to be &apos;distinct from&apos; the instrument evidencing the debt, and 16 C.F.R. § 444.2(a)(1) removes the device entirely from consumer credit.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Ignore a Minnesota Agency&apos;s Consent Letter for 60 Days and the Rule Treats Your Silence as Yes</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-data-practices-request-13-04/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-data-practices-request-13-04/</guid><description>Chapter 13 gives the subject of government data four separate rights: the Tennessen warning, a ten-business-day access clock, a 30-day correction procedure, and § 13.08 damages. The use limit in § 13.05, subd. 4 is the one with teeth.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Compelled Self-Publication in Minnesota: The Defamation Claim You Publish Yourself</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-defamation-self-publication-employment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-defamation-self-publication-employment/</guid><description>Minnesota lets a fired employee sue over a defamatory statement only the employee ever repeated. But the qualified privilege, the proof standard from Rouse, and a one-sentence statute defeat most of these claims before a jury sees them.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Earned Sick and Safe Time: Carryover, Attendance Points, and the Recordkeeping Default</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-earned-sick-and-safe-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-earned-sick-and-safe-time/</guid><description>The 1-hour-per-30-worked rule is the easy part. The exposure sits in the 80-hour carryover bank, the attendance-point prohibition, and a damages provision that fixes liability at 48 hours a year when the employer has no records.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minn. Stat. § 181.64: Minnesota&apos;s 1913 Statute Against Lying Someone Into a Job</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-false-statements-inducing-employment-181-64/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-false-statements-inducing-employment-181-64/</guid><description>Section 181.64 bars inducing a worker to relocate by knowingly lying about the job; § 181.65 supplies actual damages plus attorney fees. The limits are the whole story.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s HOA Assessment Lien Is Junior to the First Mortgage — Until the Mortgage Forecloses. Then Six Months of It Survives.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-hoa-assessment-lien-515b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-hoa-assessment-lien-515b/</guid><description>MCIOA subordinates an association&apos;s assessment lien to any first mortgage, then attaches six months of common expenses to whoever takes title out of the foreclosure. I work through § 515B.3-116 and the 2026 amendments.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Cheapest Real-Property Remedy Requires No Bond, No Hearing, and Nobody&apos;s Permission. That Is Also Its Problem.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-lis-pendens-557-02/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-lis-pendens-557-02/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 557.02 lets any party to an action affecting title record a lis pendens without a judge. What the statute requires instead — and what a wrongly recorded notice actually exposes you to.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota Marketable Title Act Is a Defense, Not a Broom. What § 541.023 Leaves Standing Is the Part That Matters.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-marketable-title-act-541-023/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-marketable-title-act-541-023/</guid><description>Everyone knows the 40-year rule in Minn. Stat. § 541.023. The useful law is in the exceptions: registered land, persons in possession, railroads and religious corporations, and covenants that run on a different clock entirely.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has No Biometric Privacy Act — and the Statute That Comes Closest Reaches Only Government Employers</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-biometric-privacy-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-biometric-privacy-act/</guid><description>Minnesota Statutes use the word &apos;biometric&apos; in 17 sections, and none of them is an Illinois-style BIPA. What actually reaches a fingerprint, faceprint, or voiceprint in Minnesota is chapter 13, one honesty-testing statute, and a school fingerprint-card rule.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Pregnancy Accommodations and Parenting Leave: Entitlements That Stack, Not Substitute</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pregnancy-accommodations-parental-leave/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pregnancy-accommodations-parental-leave/</guid><description>The accommodation statute practitioners still cite was repealed in 2021. Here is where the duty actually lives now, why a four-person employer owes it, and what can and cannot be counted against the 12-week leave.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>One Minnesota Settlement Letter Runs Two Devices. Only One of Them Requires You to Name It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-rule-68-offers-of-judgment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-rule-68-offers-of-judgment/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 68 shifts costs, but only if the offer &apos;expressly refers to Rule 68.&apos; Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(b), reallocates interest off any written offer. Different clocks, different comparisons, and a zone where one does nothing.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Social Media Manipulation Act Regulates Disclosure, Not Design — and the Statute That Changes That Was Signed in May 2026 and Is Not in Force Until July 1, 2027</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-social-media-manipulation-act-325m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-social-media-manipulation-act-325m/</guid><description>Sections 325M.30–.34 compel a platform to publish statistics about itself and give no one a private cause of action. Section 325M.40, added by Laws 2026, ch. 111, creates a $10,000 statutory-damages claim for a child or parent — effective July 1, 2027.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Makes a Judgment Creditor Fail Before It Lets Him Ask Questions</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-supplementary-proceedings-575-02/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-supplementary-proceedings-575-02/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 575.02 hands a creditor an order compelling the debtor to appear and answer under oath — but only after an execution issued to the right sheriff comes back unsatisfied. Chapter 575 then does far more than ask questions.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Certificate of Title Is Not Conclusive. Seven Enumerated Interests Survive It — and So Does Anything the Buyer Actually Knows.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-torrens-registered-land/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-torrens-registered-land/</guid><description>What Torrens registration under Minn. Stat. ch. 508 really cuts off, the seven exceptions in § 508.25, and why a reference on the record is not notice while off-record knowledge is.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Veterans Preference Act: A Discharge Statute Whose Remedy Is a Writ of Mandamus</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-veterans-preference-197-46/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-veterans-preference-197-46/</guid><description>Section 197.46 gives a covered veteran a hearing before removal and names mandamus as the remedy — which in Minnesota means a jury-triable civil action carrying a damages judgment.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Wage Theft Crime Runs on Paperwork: § 181.032 and § 609.52, Subd. 2(a)(19)</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wage-theft-notice-181-032/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wage-theft-notice-181-032/</guid><description>Minnesota made wage theft a theft offense — but the criminal clause borrowed its measuring stick from the notice and earnings-statement requirements of § 181.032. The paperwork is the case.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Firing Your Lawyer Does Not Fire the Fee: How a Minnesota Attorney&apos;s Lien Follows the Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-attorney-lien-481-13/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-attorney-lien-481-13/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 481.13 gives a lawyer a lien on the cause of action itself from service of the summons — and under City of Oronoco the cause-of-action lien needs no filing to outrank third parties. What the fired lawyer recovers is reasonable value, not the contract fee.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Judgment Dies Ten Years After Entry — Not Ten Years After You Docket It</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-collecting-a-judgment-docketing-liens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-collecting-a-judgment-docketing-liens/</guid><description>Entry, docketing, and execution are three different acts. Under Minn. Stat. § 548.09, subd. 1, the lien begins at docketing but the judgment survives only ten years from entry — and renewing an ordinary money judgment under § 541.04 means filing a new lawsuit, not a form.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Executor Gets the Envelope, Not the Letter — Minnesota&apos;s Digital Assets Act</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-digital-assets-fiduciary-access/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-digital-assets-fiduciary-access/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 521A gives a personal representative the catalog of a decedent&apos;s electronic communications by default and the content only with consent — and a provider&apos;s online tool overrides your will.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Losing a Hard Drive and Losing a Truck Are Judged Differently in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-discovery-sanctions-spoliation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-discovery-sanctions-spoliation/</guid><description>Minnesota sanctions evidence lost before suit under a court&apos;s inherent authority, and it has no spoliation tort. Rule 37.05&apos;s federal-style intent-to-deprive threshold reaches only electronically stored information.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Three Things Come Off a Minnesota Estate Before Anyone Inherits — and One of Them Expires in Nine Months</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-homestead-exempt-property-family-allowance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-homestead-exempt-property-family-allowance/</guid><description>Homestead descent, the $15,000 exempt property selection, and the family allowance outrank creditors and the will under Minn. Stat. §§ 524.2-402 to 524.2-405 — but the homestead right is deemed waived unless the spouse files. I explain the clock.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Most Minnesota Estates Never See a Judge. The Person Who Opens Them Is Not Allowed to Give You Legal Advice.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-informal-vs-formal-probate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-informal-vs-formal-probate/</guid><description>Informal probate is granted by a registrar, not a judge, and Minn. Stat. § 524.3-711 lets the personal representative deal with estate property &apos;without notice, hearing, or order of court&apos; — real estate 30 days after letters issue. Minnesota repealed its counterpart to the UPC&apos;s notice of appointment to heirs in 1975.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota, Your Spouse&apos;s Children Can Cut Your Spouse&apos;s Inheritance</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-intestate-succession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-intestate-succession/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-102 does not give the whole estate to a surviving spouse whenever there are stepchildren on either side — including the surviving spouse&apos;s own children from a prior relationship.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Most Minnesota Civil Cases, ADR Is Not Optional — Only the Process Is</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mandatory-adr-rule-114/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mandatory-adr-rule-114/</guid><description>Under Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 114.04(b), a party who will not agree on an ADR process does not avoid ADR — the court &apos;shall order&apos; a non-binding one. Seven exceptions, a separate inability-to-pay provision, and a 21-day clock that turns a &apos;non-binding&apos; arbitration award into an unappealable judgment.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Married After You Signed Your Will. Minnesota Has a Rule for That — With Four Ways Out.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-omitted-spouse-and-children/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-omitted-spouse-and-children/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-301 gives a spouse married after the will an intestate share, and § 524.2-302 protects only children born or adopted after the will was signed. Both statutes are narrower than they look.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Personal Representative Is Held to a Trustee&apos;s Standard — and Has Six Months of Protection After Closing</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-personal-representative-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-personal-representative-liability/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.3-712 measures a personal representative&apos;s breach &apos;to the same extent as a trustee of an express trust,&apos; and § 524.3-1005 bars claims six months after the closing statement — except for three things it does not cover.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota, a Will Can Override a POD Account — If It Names the Account</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pod-and-joint-accounts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-pod-and-joint-accounts/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.6-204(d) lets a will change a survivorship or POD designation by specific reference. That is not the rule in most states, and the exception is narrower than it sounds.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Writes the Appraisal Clause Into Your Fire Policy by Statute. It Fixes the Amount and Decides Nothing About Coverage.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-property-insurance-appraisal-65a01/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-property-insurance-appraisal-65a01/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 65A.01, subd. 3 writes appraisal into every Minnesota fire policy — 20 days to name an appraiser, an itemized award of any two — and provides that nothing is waived by a proceeding relating to appraisal. Hail runs on § 65A.26&apos;s ten days and one year.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Divorce Already Rewrote Your Beneficiary Forms — and in 2025 Minnesota Extended It to Your Ex&apos;s Family</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-revocation-by-divorce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-revocation-by-divorce/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-804 revokes beneficiary designations to a former spouse by operation of law, survived a Contracts Clause challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court, and was broadened in 2025.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s 21-Day Safe Harbor Decides Sanctions Motions. The Misconduct Usually Doesn&apos;t.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-rule-11-sanctions-549211-safe-harbor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-rule-11-sanctions-549211-safe-harbor/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 11 and Minn. Stat. § 549.211 both bar filing a sanctions motion until 21 days after it is served. Skip the window and Minnesota courts reject the motion — even where the conduct violated the rule.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Defense Medical Exam: What Minn. R. Civ. P. 35 Actually Says</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-rule-35-medical-examination/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-rule-35-medical-examination/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 35 never uses the word &apos;independent&apos; — the scheduling rule does. What the rule actually requires is a motion, a condition &apos;in controversy,&apos; &apos;good cause shown,&apos; and an order specifying manner, conditions, scope and examiner. And requesting the examiner&apos;s report widens your privilege waiver beyond the case.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Most Dangerous Sentence in Minnesota&apos;s Securities Act Is Not the Fraud Provision. It Is the One About Who Carries the Burden.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-securities-act-80a-exemptions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-securities-act-80a-exemptions/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 80A.49 makes offering a security unlawful unless one of three exits applies — and § 80A.70(a) puts the burden of proving the exit on the issuer. The § 80A.76(b) registration claim needs no proof of intent and expires one year after the violation.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Security-Deposit Statute Punishes a Missing Letter, Not a Withheld Dollar</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-security-deposit-504b178/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-security-deposit-504b178/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 504B.178, subd. 4, the penalty turns on whether a written statement went out within three weeks — the withheld amount again, on top of what was wrongfully withheld, plus up to $500 for each deposit in bad faith under subd. 7.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Most Minnesota Estates Do Not Need a Probate. They Need One Page and a Thirty-Day Wait.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-small-estate-affidavit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-small-estate-affidavit/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.3-1201 moves a $75,000 estate on an affidavit with no court involvement — and the same statute is a collection tool the State can point back at you.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In a Minnesota Will Contest, the Estate Usually Pays for Both Sides</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-will-contest-capacity-undue-influence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-will-contest-capacity-undue-influence/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.3-720 pays a nominated personal representative&apos;s fees out of the estate whether or not the will he defends is admitted — which rewrites the economics of every Minnesota will contest before anybody reaches the merits.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Started Rescuing Broken Wills in 2020 — as a Pandemic Measure That Was Never Repealed</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-will-execution-harmless-error/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-will-execution-harmless-error/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.2-503 lets a court probate a will that fails the execution formalities on clear and convincing evidence of intent. It began as a temporary COVID window and was made permanent in 2021.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>&quot;No Concrete Harm, No Standing&quot;: What TransUnion v. Ramirez Did to Credit Reporting Cases</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fcra-standing-after-transunion-ramirez/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fcra-standing-after-transunion-ramirez/</guid><description>The Supreme Court held that a statutory violation is not itself an injury. For FCRA plaintiffs the practical dividing line became whether the false information was ever sent to anyone — and 6,332 of 8,185 class members lost on that.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Statutory Damages Under the FCRA Require Willfulness, and Safeco Made That Harder Than It Sounds</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fcra-willfulness-safeco-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fcra-willfulness-safeco-standard/</guid><description>Reckless disregard counts as willful — but only where the defendant&apos;s reading of the statute was objectively unreasonable. That single word decides whether a case is worth $100 to $1,000 per violation or nothing but proven actual damages.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Disputing Straight to the Creditor Can Cost You the Claim Against It</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/furnisher-liability-1681s2-private-right/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/furnisher-liability-1681s2-private-right/</guid><description>The FCRA gives consumers a private action against furnishers under § 1681s-2(b) only. Subsection (a) is enforceable by regulators alone — and (b) duties are triggered only by a dispute routed through a credit bureau.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When the Insurer Denies Coverage, a Minnesota Defendant Can Confess Judgment for Twice the Policy and Pay Nothing. The Price Is Paid by the Plaintiff.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/miller-shugart-stipulated-judgment-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/miller-shugart-stipulated-judgment-minnesota/</guid><description>Miller v. Shugart, 316 N.W.2d 729 (Minn. 1982), lets an insured settle a claim collectible only from the policy. The claimant then carries the burden of proving the settlement was reasonable — to a judge, never to a jury.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Appeal Deadlines: What Starts the Clock, and What Is Actually Appealable</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-appeal-deadlines-what-is-appealable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-appeal-deadlines-what-is-appealable/</guid><description>In Minnesota the 60-day appeal clock runs from entry for a judgment but from service of written notice of filing for an order — and the motions that toll it are a closed list.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Cannot Disinherit a Spouse in Minnesota: The Elective Share and the Revocable Trust</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-elective-share-spouse-524-2-202/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-elective-share-spouse-524-2-202/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s elective share reaches past the will into revocable trusts, beneficiary designations, and joint accounts — but nine months after death, the nonprobate transfers drop out of the calculation.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Long-Arm Statute Is Not the Fight: § 543.19 and the Five-Factor Test</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-long-arm-personal-jurisdiction-543-19/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-long-arm-personal-jurisdiction-543-19/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 543.19 reaches as far as due process allows, so the statute almost never decides the motion. Minnesota&apos;s five-factor constitutional test does — and in my experience quality of contacts beats quantity every time.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Hospital Lien Is Not a Subrogation Claim. It Is Filed at the County, It Ranks Behind Your Lawyer, and It Dies in Two Years.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-provider-liens-514-68/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-provider-liens-514-68/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 514.68–514.72 give hospitals — and only hospitals — a lien on the injury claim itself. The perfection clock is ten days, the enforcement clock is two years, and an inflated lien statement can void the lien entirely.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Can Assess You Personally for Your Company&apos;s Sales Tax Without Piercing Anything — and Without Proving You Meant To</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-responsible-person-tax-liability-270c56/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-responsible-person-tax-liability-270c56/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 270C.56 reaches the owner on a track that has nothing to do with veil piercing: no fraud, no unity of interest, no injustice finding — and, unlike federal law, no willfulness element at all.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Already Accepted the Vehicle. Here Is What That One Fact Costs You — and Why the Lemon Law Probably Does Not Rescue It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-revoking-acceptance-lemon-law/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-revoking-acceptance-lemon-law/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 336.2-608 a buyer who has accepted goods must prove substantial impairment, not just a defect. And § 325F.665&apos;s repair-attempt, out-of-service, and coverage thresholds exclude more buyers than they cover.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota Unemployment Appeal Is Decided at the First Hearing</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unemployment-appeal-268-105/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unemployment-appeal-268-105/</guid><description>One telephone hearing builds the only record that will ever exist. Minn. Stat. § 268.105 closes it, and every deadline in the appeal path is written in calendar days.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Test for Vacating a Default Judgment Is Not in Rule 60.02. It Has Four Parts, and You Have to Prove All Four.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-vacating-default-judgment-60-02/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-vacating-default-judgment-60-02/</guid><description>Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02 never mentions the four-factor test. It comes from a 1952 case decided under a repealed statute — and the factor that sinks most motions is the one movants treat as the other side&apos;s burden.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Most Credit Reporting Cases, the Fight Is About Damages — and the Proof Is Built Before Anyone Calls a Lawyer</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/proving-damages-in-a-credit-reporting-case/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/proving-damages-in-a-credit-reporting-case/</guid><description>Section 1681o pays actual damages. Section 1681n adds statutory and punitive damages but demands willfulness. Both shift fees. What separates a provable case from a frustrating one is almost always a paper trail somebody built months before I saw the file.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Thing That Kills a Minnesota UIM Claim Is Not the Settlement. It Is the Release You Signed Thirty Days Too Early.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/schmidt-clothier-uim-notice-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/schmidt-clothier-uim-notice-minnesota/</guid><description>Schmidt v. Clothier buys your underinsured-motorist carrier 30 days&apos; written notice before you release the at-fault driver. American Family v. Baumann made skipping it presumptively fatal — and handed you the burden of proving no harm was done.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Reinvestigation That Only Asks the Furnisher Whether the Furnisher Was Right</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/what-a-reasonable-reinvestigation-requires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/what-a-reasonable-reinvestigation-requires/</guid><description>The FCRA demands a reasonable reinvestigation and procedures assuring maximum possible accuracy. The automated dispute pipeline is built to ask one question — and there are whole categories of error it structurally cannot find.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Peace Officer Discipline Procedures Act — and the 2026 Amendment the Statute Books Do Not Yet Show</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-peace-officer-discipline-626-89/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-peace-officer-discipline-626-89/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 626.89 is written for officers under investigation. For a civil plaintiff, it decides what investigative material has to exist — and a 2026 amendment just widened it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>Strip Searches in a Minnesota Jail: What Florence Actually Held, and What It Left Open</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-strip-search-jail-fourth-amendment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-strip-search-jail-fourth-amendment/</guid><description>Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders is overstated in both directions. Here is the precise scope of the intake-search rule, the questions the Court expressly reserved, and what the Eighth Circuit still treats as actionable.</description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Police Dog Bites and the Fourth Amendment: What the Eighth Circuit Actually Requires</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/police-k9-bite-excessive-force-eighth-circuit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/police-k9-bite-excessive-force-eighth-circuit/</guid><description>Minnesota K-9 bite cases run on specific Eighth Circuit law about warnings, bite duration, and qualified immunity — not on Graham v. Connor alone.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Twenty-Nine Municipal Immunities, and Two of Them Are Doors to Everything Else</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-municipal-immunity-exceptions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-municipal-immunity-exceptions/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 466.03 enumerates 29 exceptions to Minnesota municipal tort liability. Subdivision 1 makes landing in one of them immunity rather than common law, and subdivisions 7 and 15 make the list open-ended.</description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Procedural Due Process in Minnesota: Finding the Property or Liberty Interest First</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-procedural-due-process-property-liberty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-procedural-due-process-property-liberty/</guid><description>State law creates property interests; the Constitution does not. Roth, Perry, Loudermill, and Mathews v. Eldridge, applied to Minnesota public employment, licenses, and benefits.</description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Arbitration Act Has a Floor a Bank Cannot Draft Below. It Protects Your Lawyer and the Arbitrator&apos;s Disclosures — Not Your Remedies.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-bank-arbitration-clause-what-to-look-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-bank-arbitration-clause-what-to-look-for/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 572B.04 lists what a pre-dispute arbitration clause may not take away: the § 572B.16 right to a lawyer, the § 572B.12 neutral-arbitrator disclosures, and the § 572B.07 and § 572B.23 court role. What the arbitrator may award you, under § 572B.21, is on neither list.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Judge Cannot Order a Medical Malpractice Case Into Mediation</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-malpractice-trial-procedure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-malpractice-trial-procedure/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.11 is not a trial statute — the word &apos;verdict&apos; does not appear in it. It is a discovery statute with three subdivisions, and one sentence in subdivision 2 gives every party an absolute veto over ADR.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When a Minnesota Public Employee Can Be Disciplined for Speech</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-employee-first-amendment-speech/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-employee-first-amendment-speech/</guid><description>Pickering balancing, Connick&apos;s public-concern threshold, and Garcetti&apos;s official-duties rule — plus the Eighth Circuit&apos;s allocation of the burden on workplace disruption.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Probable Cause Is Usually the Whole Case: False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-false-arrest-and-probable-cause/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-false-arrest-and-probable-cause/</guid><description>For a Fourth Amendment false arrest claim, probable cause is a complete defense — and in the Eighth Circuit, even arguable probable cause ends it. The Supreme Court has twice reshaped the malicious prosecution claim since 2022, and the Eighth Circuit added a requirement in 2025.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Receiver Has Been Appointed Over the Business. What That Means in Minnesota.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-receivership-chapter-576-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-receivership-chapter-576-guide/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s receivership statute, Minn. Stat. ch. 576, distinguishes general from limited receivers and gives a court-appointed stranger control of the assets. For owners it is an emergency; for buyers of distressed assets it is an opportunity.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>What a Section 1983 Case Is Worth: Nominal, Compensatory, and Punitive Damages</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1983-damages-nominal-compensatory-punitive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1983-damages-nominal-compensatory-punitive/</guid><description>A constitutional violation is not priced by the importance of the right. Carey, Stachura, Smith v. Wade, and City of Newport set what a § 1983 plaintiff can actually recover — and from whom.</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Signed a Personal Guaranty. Here Is What You Actually Agreed To.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/personal-guaranty-minnesota-business-owner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/personal-guaranty-minnesota-business-owner/</guid><description>A personal guaranty is a separate contract that survives your company&apos;s collapse and its bankruptcy. Minnesota&apos;s statute of frauds requires it in writing — and I find the waivers buried in the boilerplate are usually more dangerous than the guaranty itself.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Arbitration and the Account You Never Opened</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-arbitration-account-you-never-opened/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-arbitration-account-you-never-opened/</guid><description>Can a bank use the arbitration clause in an account you did open to force arbitration of claims about an account you never opened? Minnesota has a rule about contracts that never existed — and it does not answer this question.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Jail Suicide and Failure to Protect: What the Eighth Circuit Requires in a Minnesota Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-jail-suicide-failure-to-protect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-jail-suicide-failure-to-protect/</guid><description>Farmer v. Brennan&apos;s deliberate-indifference standard applied to suicide and inmate-on-inmate violence — the two prongs, the Eighth Circuit&apos;s subjective rule, and the Minnesota jail standards that generate the proof.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Payment on a Minnesota Judgment Does Not Reduce the Judgment. Not Until Two Other Things Are Paid First.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-prejudgment-interest-on-verdicts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-prejudgment-interest-on-verdicts/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 549.09 runs interest across three separate periods computed by three different officials, and subdivisions 3 and 4 apply every payment to disbursements, then accrued interest, and only then to principal.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Phone&apos;s Location Is Protected by the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Decided That Twelve Years Ago.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/chatrie-geofence-warrants-minnesota-got-there-first/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/chatrie-geofence-warrants-minnesota-got-there-first/</guid><description>In Chatrie v. United States, a divided Supreme Court held that pulling a person&apos;s location data from Google is a search. Minnesota&apos;s Legislature required a warrant for exactly that in 2014 — before Carpenter, and long before this term.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Arrested for Filming the Police in Minnesota? Probable Cause Is Usually the Whole Case.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-first-amendment-retaliatory-arrest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-first-amendment-retaliatory-arrest/</guid><description>Nieves v. Bartlett requires a retaliatory-arrest plaintiff to plead and prove the absence of probable cause, with one narrow exception. In the Eighth Circuit the bar is higher still — and Minnesota&apos;s obstruction statute is where the fight actually happens.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Prison Litigation Reform Act: The Gate a Minnesota Prisoner&apos;s Case Has to Get Through First</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/prison-litigation-reform-act-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/prison-litigation-reform-act-minnesota/</guid><description>Exhaustion, the physical-injury rule, the fee cap, and three strikes. The PLRA decides prisoner cases before anyone reaches the constitutional question — here is how each piece works.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Wrongful Conviction as a § 1983 Case: Brady, Heck, and Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-brady-claims-section-1983/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-brady-claims-section-1983/</guid><description>Why a Minnesota wrongful-conviction damages case is decided on the prosecutorial-investigative line and the Eighth Circuit&apos;s bad-faith rule, not on the Brady violation itself.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>Three Minnesota Privacy Laws Apply to Your Company. The One Nobody Plans For Is the Only One With a Private Right of Action.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-three-privacy-regimes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-three-privacy-regimes/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325E.61, chapter 325M, and chapter 13 run on three different definitions, three different triggers, and three different enforcers — and § 13.05, subd. 11 pulls private contractors into the Data Practices Act whether or not the contract says a word about it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your LLC Partner Is Freezing You Out. Minnesota Gives You a Statute — and It Is Better Than Dissolution.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-member-dispute-buyout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-member-dispute-buyout/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0701 lets a Minnesota LLC member petition a court when those in control act illegally, fraudulently, or oppressively. The remedy I care about is not dissolution — it is a court-ordered buyout at fair value.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Bank Manufactured Its Customers&apos; Consent, Then Used Their Real Consent to Get the Case Out of Court</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/wells-fargo-forged-signatures-arbitration/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/wells-fargo-forged-signatures-arbitration/</guid><description>Wells Fargo opened accounts its customers never authorized — then enforced the arbitration clauses in the accounts they did authorize. How the maneuver worked, and where a Minnesotan&apos;s version of it would be decided.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The No-Fault Deduction Does Not Pay Anyone Back. It Pays the Defendant.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-collateral-deduction/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-collateral-deduction/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 1 orders the court to subtract no-fault benefits from a tort recovery — with no motion, no deadline, and, in the ordinary Minnesota crash, no subrogation right on the other side. The money does not go back to the carrier. It stays with the defendant.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Exoneration Compensation Statute: Payment Without Proving a Constitutional Violation</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-exoneration-compensation-590-11/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-exoneration-compensation-590-11/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 590.11 and the Incarceration and Exoneration Remedies Act give an exonerated Minnesotan a damages route that does not depend on proving anyone violated the Constitution.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>The Label Is the Ceiling: What Monsanto v. Durnell Means on 25 Million Minnesota Acres</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/monsanto-durnell-fifra-preemption-minnesota-farms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/monsanto-durnell-fifra-preemption-minnesota-farms/</guid><description>The Supreme Court held that federal pesticide law preempts a state failure-to-warn claim over Roundup&apos;s label. The rule it used came from a case about a device made in Fridley — and Minnesota&apos;s own statute makes the federal label binding here.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Section 1983 in Minnesota: What It Is, and Who Can Actually Be Sued</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1983-who-can-be-sued-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1983-who-can-be-sued-minnesota/</guid><description>Section 1983 creates no rights — it enforces them. Who counts as a &apos;person,&apos; why official-capacity and individual-capacity suits are two different lawsuits, and the Eighth Circuit pleading rule that has killed Minnesota claims on a caption.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>MHRA or Federal? What the Choice Actually Costs a Minnesota Discrimination Plaintiff</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mhra-or-federal-choosing-your-forum/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mhra-or-federal-choosing-your-forum/</guid><description>Damages caps, jury rights, fee shifting, exhaustion, and the election-of-remedies provisions in Minn. Stat. §§ 363A.04, 363A.07, and 363A.33 — the tradeoffs behind choosing a statute, not a calendar.</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Turned a Status Question Into a Contract Question. Almost No Funding Agreement Has Been Read That Way Since.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assignment-what-claims-can-be-sold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-assignment-what-claims-can-be-sold/</guid><description>Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners abolished champerty in 2020 and, in 2023, held that a litigation financing agreement is not subject to Minn. Stat. § 334.01&apos;s usury cap. What survives is unconscionability — a doctrine that lives entirely in the document.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>What a Minnesota Certificate of Good Standing Actually Proves — and Why It Is Less Than Your Lender Thinks</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-certificate-of-existence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-certificate-of-existence/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0207 routes an LLC certificate to § 5.12, and § 5.26 defines good standing as compliance with Secretary of State filing requirements. That is all it certifies. Not taxes, not solvency, not authority.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When Can a Creditor Come After You Personally for Your Company&apos;s Debt? Minnesota&apos;s Two-Prong Test.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/piercing-corporate-veil-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/piercing-corporate-veil-minnesota/</guid><description>Forming an LLC or a corporation is not the end of the analysis. Under Victoria Elevator Co. v. Meriden Grain Co., Minnesota courts pierce the corporate veil on a two-prong test — a non-exclusive list of relationship factors, plus injustice or fundamental unfairness.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Tennessee v. Garner, Fleeing Suspects, and Why Minnesota&apos;s Rule Is Narrower</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/tennessee-v-garner-fleeing-suspect-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/tennessee-v-garner-fleeing-suspect-minnesota/</guid><description>Garner set the constitutional floor for shooting a fleeing suspect. Minn. Stat. § 609.066, subd. 2(a)(2) sits well above it — and the felony is only half the test.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>The Courthouse Door Is Narrowing: How Ordinary People Are Being Priced and Pushed Out of Civil Justice</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/the-courthouse-door-is-narrowing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/the-courthouse-door-is-narrowing/</guid><description>A Minnesota consumer lawyer on three quiet forces—tougher pleading rules, buried class-action waivers, and plain cost—that are shutting ordinary people out of the courts.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Chapter 13 Is the Discovery You Get Before You Have a Case</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-data-practices-building-a-civil-rights-case/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-data-practices-building-a-civil-rights-case/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s Data Practices Act gives a data subject a ten-business-day response deadline, a written-denial requirement that must cite a statute, and two enforcement tracks. Most people use none of it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Is My Non-Compete Enforceable in Minnesota? If You Signed It On or After July 1, 2023, Almost Certainly Not.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-non-compete-ban-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-non-compete-ban-guide/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.988 makes employee non-competes void and unenforceable, with only two narrow exceptions — but it applies only to contracts and agreements entered into on or after July 1, 2023. Older agreements are still governed by common-law reasonableness review.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Section 1988: The Fee Statute That Decides Which Civil Rights Cases Get Brought</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1988-attorney-fees-civil-rights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1988-attorney-fees-civil-rights/</guid><description>42 U.S.C. § 1988 lets a prevailing civil rights plaintiff collect fees from the defendant. Who counts as prevailing, how the lodestar works, and the traps I watch for — Buckhannon, nominal damages, Rule 68, and fee waivers bargained into a settlement.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Gives an LLC Three Management Forms, and You Elect One in the Operating Agreement — Not the Articles</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-management-structure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-management-structure/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0407 recognizes member-managed, manager-managed, and board-managed LLCs. The default is member-managed, the election lives in the operating agreement, and what the articles say about it does not control.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Death-in-Custody § 1983 Claim in Minnesota Belongs to a Court-Appointed Trustee — Not the Family, and Not the Estate</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-death-in-custody-who-can-sue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-death-in-custody-who-can-sue/</guid><description>Section 1983 says a violator is liable &apos;to the party injured,&apos; and says nothing about who sues when the injured party is dead. Federal law sends that question to Minnesota&apos;s wrongful death statute — and the Eighth Circuit has enforced it against an estate that got the wrong appointment.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Won the Right to Your Home Equity. The Supreme Court Just Decided How Little It Is Worth.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/pung-tax-forfeiture-surplus-after-tyler/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/pung-tax-forfeiture-surplus-after-tyler/</guid><description>Tyler v. Hennepin County made it unconstitutional for a county to keep your surplus after a tax forfeiture. In Pung v. Isabella County, the Court held the surplus is measured by the auction price — not what the home was worth. Minnesota homeowners have six months to claim it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The ADA Buys You a Ramp. The Minnesota Human Rights Act Can Buy You Damages.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-accommodations-363a11/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-public-accommodations-363a11/</guid><description>A private plaintiff under ADA Title III gets injunctive relief and fees, not money. Minn. Stat. § 363A.11 reaches damages — but § 363A.331 requires a pre-suit notice, with at least 60 days to respond, before counsel files an architectural-barrier case.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Housing Discrimination Law Covers More Than the Federal Fair Housing Act Does</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-fair-housing-discrimination-363a09/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-fair-housing-discrimination-363a09/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 363A.09 protects creed, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, and status with regard to public assistance — classes the federal Fair Housing Act does not list. That gap decides which statute you sue under.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Trustee Can Hire Out the Work — and Keep the Liability, Unless All Three Duties Are Met</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-delegation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-delegation/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0807 lets a trustee delegate to anyone, including an affiliate. The liability shield in paragraph (c) is conditional on selection, scope, and ongoing monitoring — and Minnesota&apos;s Prudent Investor Act has no separate delegation rule.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Law Says Legal Cannabis Costs You Nothing at the Gun Safe. Federal Law Said Otherwise — Until June.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/hemani-cannabis-firearms-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/hemani-cannabis-firearms-minnesota/</guid><description>In United States v. Hemani, the Supreme Court held that prosecuting a marijuana user for keeping a gun at home violated the Second Amendment. Minnesota&apos;s firearms statute already carved out adult-use and medical cannabis. The two systems still do not line up.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Other Half of a Minnesota Force Case: State-Law Claims, Official Immunity, and the Malice Standard</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-police-state-law-claims-vs-1983/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-police-state-law-claims-vs-1983/</guid><description>A § 1983 claim and a Minnesota battery claim arising from the same arrest run on different immunities, different damages ceilings, and different clocks. Pleading only one is a decision, and it is usually made by accident.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Disability and the Police Encounter: ADA Title II, Section 504, and Minnesota&apos;s &apos;Special Care&apos; Language</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ada-title-ii-law-enforcement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ada-title-ii-law-enforcement/</guid><description>Title II of the ADA reaches police departments, and the Eighth Circuit has applied it to the transport of a disabled arrestee. Whether it reaches the arrest itself is still open — the Supreme Court declined to answer.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Supreme Court Just Closed a Federal Door for Fund Investors. Minnesota&apos;s Own Securities Act Is Now Load-Bearing — and It Runs on a Shorter Clock.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fs-credit-saba-investment-company-act-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fs-credit-saba-investment-company-act-minnesota/</guid><description>In FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital, the Court held there is no private right of action under Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act. Minnesota&apos;s blue-sky statute gives express private remedies, with limitations periods as short as one year.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Closing a Minnesota Trust: The 30-Day Objection Window Only Works If the Proposal Says It Exists</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-distribution-upon-termination/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-distribution-upon-termination/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0817 lets a trustee cut off objections to a final distribution in 30 days — but only if the proposal told the beneficiary about the right to object and the time allowed. It also lets the trustee hold a reserve.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Forgot to List Your Lawsuit in Bankruptcy? The Supreme Court Says That Is Not Automatically the End of It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/keathley-bankruptcy-nondisclosure-judicial-estoppel-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/keathley-bankruptcy-nondisclosure-judicial-estoppel-minnesota/</guid><description>In Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, a unanimous Court threw out a test that killed injury claims based on a debtor&apos;s &apos;motive to conceal.&apos; The Eighth Circuit — which governs Minnesota — has taken the better view since 2006.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Working With the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: A Landowner&apos;s Guide to Minnesota&apos;s Overlapping Water and Wetland Rules</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnehaha-creek-watershed-district-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnehaha-creek-watershed-district-guide/</guid><description>How the MCWD&apos;s permits, the Wetland Conservation Act, and a half-dozen agencies overlap on one backyard project — and why the landowner carries the burden of proof.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Denied Medical Care in a Minnesota Jail: What the Eighth Circuit Actually Requires</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-jail-medical-care-deliberate-indifference/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-jail-medical-care-deliberate-indifference/</guid><description>Kingsley&apos;s objective standard governs excessive force against a pretrial detainee. The Eighth Circuit has not extended it to medical care — so in Minnesota, plan on proving what the jailer actually knew.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Body-Camera Footage Is Private by Default. Here Is Who Can Actually Get It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-police-body-camera-data-13825/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-police-body-camera-data-13825/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 13.825 classifies body-worn camera data as private or nonpublic and then carves out five exceptions. The retention floor is 90 days — which is the number that decides most cases.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Carrier Was Fined $57 Million for Mishandling Your Location Data. You Were Not a Party, and Minnesota Law Will Not Let You Be One.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fcc-att-location-data-penalties-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/fcc-att-location-data-penalties-minnesota/</guid><description>In FCC v. AT&amp;T, the Court upheld the FCC&apos;s power to impose forfeiture penalties without a jury. Minnesota&apos;s own Consumer Data Privacy Act took effect July 31, 2025 — with real rights, and enforcement reserved exclusively to the Attorney General.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Three Years, Not One: What Actually Starts the Clock on a Minnesota Claim Against a Trustee</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-limitation-action-against-trustee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-limitation-action-against-trustee/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.1005 sets three years from an adequate report and six years otherwise. The fight is never the arithmetic — it is whether a document was a report that adequately disclosed a potential claim.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Don&apos;t Have to Cross a State Line: The Supreme Court Expands the Arbitration Exemption for Delivery Drivers</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/flowers-foods-brock-arbitration-exemption/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/flowers-foods-brock-arbitration-exemption/</guid><description>In Flowers Foods v. Brock, a unanimous Court held that last-mile drivers moving goods that traveled interstate are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act — even if the driver never leaves the state. A rare decision that opens the courthouse door.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Choke Holds, Hogties, and Face-Down Transport: What Minn. Stat. § 609.06, Subd. 3 Actually Says</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-choke-hold-prone-restraint-ban/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-choke-hold-prone-restraint-ban/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s 2020 restraint limits are conditional, not flat bans — they turn on whether deadly force would be authorized. Plus the warrior-style training prohibition.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>Someone Used Your Identity. Minnesota Requires Police to Take the Report — and That Report Unlocks Everything Else.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-identity-theft-victim-steps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-identity-theft-victim-steps/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 609.527, a Minnesota law enforcement agency must prepare a police report and give the complainant a copy, and courts must order at least $1,000 in restitution to each direct victim. I explain why that report unlocks your federal remedies.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Keeps Legislating Against Forced Arbitration. The Honest Question Is How Much of It Survives the FAA.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-arbitration-what-the-state-can-resist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-arbitration-what-the-state-can-resist/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 572B, § 337.10, subd. 1, and § 181.988, subd. 3 each tell Minnesota parties something about where and whether they must arbitrate. Two of the three name arbitration expressly — which is precisely the feature the Federal Arbitration Act treats with suspicion.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>When Cotrustees Disagree: Why Voting No Is Not Enough in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-cotrustees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-cotrustees/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0703 says a trustee who does not join in another trustee&apos;s action is not liable for it — and then takes most of that back in paragraph (g). What a dissenting Minnesota cotrustee actually has to do.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Judgment Creditor Is Garnishing You. Minnesota Protects More Than You Think — but Only If You Claim It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-garnishment-exemptions-judgment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-garnishment-exemptions-judgment/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 550.37 exempts a substantial list of property from collection, and § 571.922 caps wage garnishment on a sliding scale. Exemptions are not automatic. Unclaimed, they are waived — and the amounts change every even-numbered year.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Six Years — and the Footnote It Rests On: the § 1983 Limitations Period in Minnesota</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1983-limitations-period-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/section-1983-limitations-period-minnesota/</guid><description>Section 1983 has no limitations period of its own. In Minnesota the borrowed period is six years, and the Eighth Circuit has said so in a published opinion. The citation trail behind that answer is messier than the answer.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Four Years Is the Easy Part of a Minnesota Malpractice Deadline. &apos;Health Care Provider&apos; Means Four Different Things.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-malpractice-deadlines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-malpractice-deadlines/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 541.076 gives four years from accrual. But the definition of &apos;health care provider&apos; in the limitations statute is not the definition used by the minority-tolling statute, the expert-affidavit statute, or the death statutes.</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Suing the City Under Monell: Why Naming the Department Is the Easy Part</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-monell-municipal-liability-police/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-monell-municipal-liability-police/</guid><description>Section 1983 has no respondeat superior. A Minnesota city answers only for its own policy or custom, and the Eighth Circuit&apos;s custom test asks for a pattern of similar misconduct, not a single incident.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Salaried Doesn&apos;t Always Mean &apos;No Overtime&apos;: A Plain-English Guide to Minnesota Wage-and-Hour Rights</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wage-and-hour-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wage-and-hour-guide/</guid><description>Exempt vs. non-exempt, tips, overtime, and wage theft in Minnesota — what the law actually says, told through everyday scenarios.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>You Can Be Billed for Leaving a Pension Plan Using Assumptions Nobody Had Adopted When You Left</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/withdrawal-liability-mk-employee-solutions-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/withdrawal-liability-mk-employee-solutions-minnesota/</guid><description>In M&amp;K Employee Solutions v. IAM National Pension Fund, a unanimous Court held that withdrawal-liability assumptions need not be chosen by the measurement date. Minnesota has one of the most heavily unionized workforces in the country.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Favorite Enforcement Tool Is Total Forfeiture — and Who Gets the Cure Tells You What the Legislature Was Thinking</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-forfeiture-as-enforcement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-forfeiture-as-enforcement/</guid><description>When a Minnesota notice requirement is missed, the sanction is usually loss of the entire right: no lien, no claim, a void deed, a dismissed case. But the exceptions are not random — the cure goes to the party with less leverage.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s &apos;Fireman&apos;s Rule&apos; Statute Is an Anti-Fireman&apos;s-Rule Statute — and in May 2026 It Got Bigger</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-firemans-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-firemans-rule/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.06 does not codify the common law fireman&apos;s rule. It disables it for peace officers and public safety officers. A 2026 amendment enlarged the covered class and applied the change retroactively to February 1, 2020.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Qualified Immunity in the Eighth Circuit: What &quot;Clearly Established&quot; Actually Requires</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-qualified-immunity-clearly-established/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-qualified-immunity-clearly-established/</guid><description>Qualified immunity is not a defense on the merits — it is a rule about how specific the prior case law has to be. In the Eighth Circuit, that usually means finding a case with facts close to yours.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>North America&apos;s Largest Freight Broker Is Headquartered in Eden Prairie. The Supreme Court Just Held Brokers Can Be Sued for Hiring Unsafe Truckers.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/montgomery-caribe-freight-broker-liability-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/montgomery-caribe-freight-broker-liability-minnesota/</guid><description>In Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, a unanimous Court held that negligent-hiring claims against freight brokers are not preempted by the FAAAA. The industry&apos;s center of gravity sits in Minnesota, and so does the exposure.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Gave Product Manufacturers a Defense Instead of a Repose Statute. The Difference Is the Whole Case.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-useful-life-product-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-useful-life-product-defense/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.03 makes expiration of a product&apos;s ordinary useful life a defense — not a deadline. It has no date certain, the manufacturer&apos;s own stated service life is one of six nonexclusive factors, and it does not bar the claim.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Merchants&apos; Handshake, Repurposed: How a 1925 Arbitration Law Became a Shield Against Consumers</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/federal-arbitration-act-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/federal-arbitration-act-consumers/</guid><description>The Federal Arbitration Act was written to help merchants settle commercial disputes. Four decades of Supreme Court decisions turned it into a tool that pushes consumers out of court.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Excessive Force in Minnesota: Graham v. Connor and What the Eighth Circuit Actually Asks</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-excessive-force-graham-objective-reasonableness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-excessive-force-graham-objective-reasonableness/</guid><description>The Fourth Amendment asks whether force was objectively reasonable. Minnesota&apos;s statute asks whether it was necessary. One incident, two standards, two different answers.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>They Repossessed the Collateral and Now Want the Difference. In Minnesota, How They Sold It Is the Whole Case.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/ucc-article-9-repossession-deficiency-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/ucc-article-9-repossession-deficiency-minnesota/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 336.9-610 makes every aspect of a collateral sale answer for its commercial reasonableness. A lender that sold carelessly, or skipped proper notice, can watch its deficiency shrink to zero.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Ten-Day Paper Trial That Decides What a Minnesota Verdict Is Worth</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-collateral-source-offset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-collateral-source-offset/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 548.251 is not a damages rule. It is a written evidentiary proceeding on a ten-day fuse, it applies only where there is a verdict, it never reaches future benefits, and in an auto case it is usually not the operative statute at all.</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minn. Stat. § 609.066: Minnesota&apos;s Deadly-Force Standard Is Tighter Than the Fourth Amendment</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-deadly-force-statute-609066/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-deadly-force-statute-609066/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s Legislature wrote a deadly-force rule stricter than the federal constitutional floor — necessity plus a three-part threat test. Here is what it says and where it bites.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>An Irrevocable Trust Is Not as Irrevocable as It Sounds. Minnesota Lets Trustees Decant.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-decanting-irrevocable-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-decanting-irrevocable-trust/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 502.851, a Minnesota trustee can pour the assets of an old trust into a new one with better terms — no court order, 60 days&apos; notice. How much can change depends entirely on the trustee&apos;s discretion under the original document. I walk through the statute.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Personal Injury Claims No Longer Die With the Injured Person</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-survival-of-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-survival-of-claims/</guid><description>Until May 20, 2023, Minn. Stat. § 573.01 said a personal injury cause of action &apos;dies with the person.&apos; It now says the claim survives the death of any party. What that changed — and what it did not.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Enbridge Waited 887 Days to Move Its Case to Federal Court. The Supreme Court Sent It Back — and Minnesota Signed the Brief.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/enbridge-nessel-removal-deadline-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/enbridge-nessel-removal-deadline-minnesota/</guid><description>In Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel, a unanimous Court held the 30-day removal deadline cannot be equitably tolled. Minnesota&apos;s Attorney General was on the winning side, and 337 miles of Enbridge pipeline run through this state.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Should You Set Up a Trust in South Dakota? Minnesota Trust Law vs. the &apos;Trust-Friendly&apos; States</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-vs-south-dakota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-vs-south-dakota/</guid><description>An honest comparison of Minnesota trust law with South Dakota, Nevada, Delaware, Alaska, and Wyoming — asset protection, dynasty trusts, and taxes, with the real limits.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>You Signed It Under Penalty of Perjury: Personal Liability for an Inaccurate Minnesota LLC Filing</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-inaccurate-filed-record-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-inaccurate-filed-record-liability/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0206 makes a signer who knew the record was inaccurate personally liable to anyone who suffers a loss by relying on it — and reaches members and managers who never signed anything at all.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Company Was Breached. Minnesota Gives You No Deadline in Days — Which Is Worse Than a Deadline.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-data-breach-notification-325e61/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-data-breach-notification-325e61/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325E.61 requires notice &apos;in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay,&apos; plus notice to the national credit bureaus within 48 hours when more than 500 people are notified at one time. Enforcement is the Attorney General&apos;s alone — and GLBA financial institutions are exempt outright.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Minnesota LLC Was Administratively Terminated. It Was Not Dissolved, and $25 Fixes Most of It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-annual-renewal-and-reinstatement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-annual-renewal-and-reinstatement/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0705 terminates an LLC that misses the free annual renewal. Section 322C.0706 reinstates it retroactively and validates the contracts signed in the gap — but only three of its effects, and only for domestic companies.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Abolished Champerty in 2020. Litigation Funding Is Now Legal Here — and Mostly Unregulated.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/litigation-funding-minnesota-maslowski/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/litigation-funding-minnesota-maslowski/</guid><description>In Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners, the Minnesota Supreme Court abolished the common-law prohibition against champerty. Third-party litigation funding is enforceable in Minnesota. The protections that remain are contract law and unconscionability.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Asset Purchase vs. Stock/Equity Purchase: How Deal Structure Changes Everything When You Buy or Sell a Minnesota Business</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-business-asset-vs-stock-purchase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-business-asset-vs-stock-purchase/</guid><description>A Minnesota deal lawyer&apos;s plain-English guide to asset vs. equity purchases — liabilities, successor risk, the non-compete ban, taxes, and why the choice matters.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota Professional Firms Act Is Opt-In — and It Does Not Shield You From Your Own Malpractice</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-professional-firms-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-professional-firms-act/</guid><description>Chapter 319B applies only if your organizational document says three specific things. Minn. Stat. § 319B.03, subd. 2 sets the election; § 319B.06, subd. 3 declines to change what you owe the person you served.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Supreme Court Just Took Your Internet Provider Off the Hook. Minnesota Already Knows Who Gets Sued Instead.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/cox-sony-isp-liability-what-it-means-for-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/cox-sony-isp-liability-what-it-means-for-minnesota/</guid><description>In Cox v. Sony Music, the Court erased a $1 billion verdict and held that an ISP is not liable merely for serving subscribers it knows are infringing. The last time the music industry could not reach the middleman, it sued a mother of four from Brainerd.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>For a Minnesota Business Owner, the Estate Plan and the Buy-Sell Are One Instrument. They Are Almost Never Drafted by the Same People, in the Same Year, Against the Same Number.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-estate-plan-and-buy-sell-are-one-document/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-estate-plan-and-buy-sell-are-one-document/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 302A.751, subds. 2 and 3a make a buy-sell binding in a Minnesota buyout. Connelly v. United States says the same agreement is &apos;ordinarily not dispositive&apos; for the estate tax. Section 507.071, ch. 523, and § 524.3-803 each miss the entity.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota LLC Derivative Action: Four Gates Before Anyone Reaches the Merits</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-derivative-action/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-derivative-action/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 322C.0902 and 322C.0903 decide whether a member&apos;s claim survives the caption. Demand, futility, proper-plaintiff status, and the direct/derivative line each dismiss cases on their own.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Credit Bureau &apos;Verified&apos; the Error Anyway: What to Do When a Credit-Report Mistake Won&apos;t Get Fixed</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/credit-report-error-wont-get-fixed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/credit-report-error-wont-get-fixed/</guid><description>You disputed the error and the bureau closed it as &apos;verified.&apos; Why self-disputes fail, what the FCRA actually requires, and the moment it becomes a legal claim.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Six Ways a Minnesota LLC Dissolves — and Only Two of Them Are a Remedy</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-dissolution-events/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-dissolution-events/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0701 lists six dissolution triggers. I read it as a map of who holds which key — three triggers your operating agreement can rewrite, two court powers it cannot touch.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Moving Assets Before the Creditor Arrives: Minnesota&apos;s Eleven Badges of Fraud</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-fraudulent-transfer-uvta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-fraudulent-transfer-uvta/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 513.44 lets a creditor unwind a transfer made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud — and lists eleven factors courts weigh. Most of them describe things people do without believing they are doing anything wrong.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Trustee&apos;s Duty of Impartiality Is Not a Duty to Treat Beneficiaries Equally</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-duty-of-impartiality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-duty-of-impartiality/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0803 requires a trustee to give &apos;due regard to the beneficiaries&apos; respective interests&apos; — interests the settlor usually made unequal on purpose. The qualifier is the rule.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota Estate Tax Trap: Why &apos;Not Wealthy&apos; Families Can Still Owe — and How Trusts Help</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-estate-tax-trap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-estate-tax-trap/</guid><description>Minnesota taxes estates over $3 million even when no federal tax is owed. Here&apos;s who gets caught, why married couples are especially exposed, and how planning helps.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Lets You Sue as a Private Attorney General — With Fees. Most People Have Never Heard of § 8.31.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-private-attorney-general-831/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-private-attorney-general-831/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 8.31, subd. 3a gives any person injured by a violation of Minnesota&apos;s consumer protection statutes a civil action for damages, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorney&apos;s fees. I consider it the most underused remedy in Minnesota consumer law.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Trust Can Sit Empty, and Sometimes Should</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-successor-trustee-vacancy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-successor-trustee-vacancy/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0704 tells you when a Minnesota trusteeship vacancy has to be filled, when it does not, and the four-tier order I work through before anyone pays for a petition.</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Paid Leave Is Live: What Employers and Employees Need to Know Now</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-paid-leave-now-in-effect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-paid-leave-now-in-effect/</guid><description>Benefits began January 1, 2026, and the first premiums were due April 30. A plain-English guide to the 2026 premium rate, the leave categories, the 20-week cap, and where Minnesota employers most often get this wrong.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Postal Service Can Fail to Deliver Your Mail on Purpose, and You Cannot Sue It. In Minnesota, the Mail Carries the Deadline.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/postal-service-konan-mail-notice-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/postal-service-konan-mail-notice-minnesota/</guid><description>In Postal Service v. Konan, a 5–4 Court held the FTCA&apos;s postal exception bars claims for intentional nondelivery. Minnesota law starts foreclosure clocks, surplus-claim clocks, and response deadlines from the moment something is mailed.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Release a Minnesota Trustee Asks You to Sign Protects the Trustee Only If the Trustee Told You Enough</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-beneficiary-consent-and-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-beneficiary-consent-and-release/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.1009 makes a beneficiary&apos;s consent, release, or ratification binding — with two exceptions that turn on what the trustee knew and what the beneficiary was told.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Sued the Manufacturer and the Store That Sold It. A Defendant Cannot Dismiss the Store to Get Into Federal Court.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/hain-celestial-palmquist-forum-choice-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/hain-celestial-palmquist-forum-choice-minnesota/</guid><description>In Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist, a unanimous Court held that erroneously dismissing a non-diverse defendant after removal does not cure the jurisdictional defect. A federal jury trial and a defense judgment were vacated for want of jurisdiction.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Why Put Your House in a Trust? An Honest Guide for Minnesota Homeowners</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/put-your-house-in-a-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/put-your-house-in-a-trust/</guid><description>A plain-English look at what a revocable living trust does and doesn&apos;t do for a Minnesota home — probate, homestead, taxes, and the transfer-on-death deed alternative.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>Fairness Is Not a Defense to Half of Minnesota&apos;s Trustee Loyalty Rule</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-duty-of-loyalty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-duty-of-loyalty/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0802 sets out three different regimes with three different burdens. A fair price defeats a claim under paragraph (d) and does nothing at all under paragraph (b).</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Wrote Shareholders&apos; Reasonable Expectations Into Its Corporation Statute. Most Corporate Codes Never Mention Them.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-shareholder-oppression-302a751/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-shareholder-oppression-302a751/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 302A.751 lets a shareholder in a Minnesota corporation that is not publicly held sue over conduct that is &apos;unfairly prejudicial&apos; — and subdivision 3a directs courts to weigh the parties&apos; reasonable expectations. The remedy is usually a buyout at fair value.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A New Minnesota Tool Against Elder Financial Exploitation: The Protection Order That Can Freeze an Account</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/protection-order-financial-exploitation-vulnerable-adult/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/protection-order-financial-exploitation-vulnerable-adult/</guid><description>As of January 1, 2026, Minnesota courts can issue an order for protection against financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult — freezing assets and lines of credit and barring contact. Here is who can ask for one and what a court must find.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Writing Requirements Are Not Formalities. They Are a Rule About Who Pays for Silence.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-statute-of-frauds-as-a-remedy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-statute-of-frauds-as-a-remedy/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 513.01, § 507.02, § 334.01, subd. 2, § 181.723, subd. 4(a)(9), and § 504B.291, subd. 1(c) all require a writing — and read together they put the cost of an undocumented deal on the party who had the power and the reason to document it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Trust&apos;s Fee Clause Does Not Settle the Trustee&apos;s Fee</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-compensation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-compensation/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0708 lets a Minnesota court raise or lower the compensation a trust document specifies — and § 501C.0105(b)(7) makes that power one of the few things a settlor cannot draft around.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota LLC Operating Agreements: Why They Matter and How They Fail</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-operating-agreements/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-operating-agreements/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s LLC act fills every gap in your operating agreement with default rules. What those defaults actually say, and the eight places I watch these agreements break down.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Lets You Pass Your House Outside Probate With One Recorded Page. It Is Also Easy to Get Wrong.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-transfer-on-death-deed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-transfer-on-death-deed/</guid><description>A transfer on death deed under Minn. Stat. § 507.071 moves real property at death without probate, stays revocable while you live, and costs a recording fee. I see four defects over and over: no recording, one spousal signature on a homestead, the public assistance clearance certificate, and no right of exoneration.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Prices the Same Unpaid Dollar at 4 Percent, 10 Percent, or 18 Percent. That Spread Settles More Cases Than the Merits Do.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-price-of-delay-interest-rates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-price-of-delay-interest-rates/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(c) splits judgment interest at a $50,000 hinge — 4% for 2026 versus a flat ten percent. Section 337.10, subd. 3 charges 1-1/2 percent per month on construction payables. Sections 334.01 and 334.011 govern the private note.</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Retailer&apos;s Escape Hatch in Minnesota Product Cases Only Opens If the Plaintiff Opens It — and It Only Lets Out One Claim</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-product-liability-seller-not-manufacturer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-product-liability-seller-not-manufacturer/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 544.41 lets a nonmanufacturer certify the manufacturer&apos;s identity and be dismissed. The dismissal is conditional, reversible on five grounds, and reaches only strict liability in tort.</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Harshest Litigation Trap May Not Follow You Into Federal Court</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/expert-affidavit-federal-court-berk-choy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/expert-affidavit-federal-court-berk-choy/</guid><description>In Berk v. Choy, the Supreme Court held that a state affidavit-of-merit requirement does not apply in federal court. Minnesota has two of them — and Minnesota&apos;s Attorney General signed the brief urging the Court to rule the other way.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Fifty Percent and Fifty-One Percent Are Different Cases in Minnesota. One Point of Fault Decides Who Bears the Empty Chair.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-joint-and-several-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-joint-and-several-liability/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.02, subd. 1 made several liability the default in 2003 and kept joint and several liability for four categories — including any defendant whose fault is greater than 50 percent.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>You Bought the Assets, Not the Company. In Minnesota, a Statute Now Decides Whether You Bought the Liabilities Too.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/successor-liability-minnesota-asset-purchase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/successor-liability-minnesota-asset-purchase/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 302A.661, subd. 4 limits an asset buyer&apos;s liability to what the contract or another statute imposes, and says an asset sale is not a de facto merger. The federal courts read it as abrogating most of the old common-law exceptions. The Minnesota Court of Appeals has never squarely agreed.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Welcome to the New madgettlaw.com</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/welcome-to-the-new-madgettlaw-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/welcome-to-the-new-madgettlaw-com/</guid><description>Madgett Law has launched a faster, cleaner website — with a new News section where we&apos;ll share legal insights and firm updates.</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>firm-news</category><author>Madgett Law, LLC</author></item><item><title>The Bank Wants the Whole Trust. Minnesota Built a Statute So You Would Not Have to Hand It Over — and Then Left Out the Penalty.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-certificate-of-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-certificate-of-trust/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.1013 lets a trustee prove the trust with a six-item certificate instead of the dispositive terms. It contains no consequence for a third party who refuses it, and knowing that changes how you argue.</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Judgment Entered Without Jurisdiction Is Void. The Supreme Court Just Put a Clock on Saying So.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/void-judgment-clock-coney-island-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/void-judgment-clock-coney-island-minnesota/</guid><description>In Coney Island Auto Parts v. Burton, the Court held that a motion attacking a void judgment must still be filed within a reasonable time. In Minnesota, where 82% of debt-collection cases in district court end in default, that is not an academic rule.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Revocable Trust Does Not Stop the Settlor&apos;s Creditors — and Avoiding Probate Removes the Four-Month Bar That Would Have Stopped Them</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-creditor-claims-against-a-revocable-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-creditor-claims-against-a-revocable-trust/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0505 subjects revocable trust property to the settlor&apos;s creditors in life and at death. It attaches no claims procedure and no deadline of its own, which cuts against the trustee.</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Shareholder Control Agreement Can Take Power Away From the Board. It Also Becomes the Exhibit That Defines Everyone&apos;s Reasonable Expectations.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-shareholder-control-agreements-302a457/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-shareholder-control-agreements-302a457/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 302A.457 lets shareholders do by agreement what bylaws cannot — move the board&apos;s authority, and the directors&apos; liability, to themselves. It is also what a court reads under § 302A.751, subd. 3a.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Banned Non-Competes in 2023. Trade Secret Law Is What Employers Have Left — and It Is Sharper Than People Think.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trade-secrets-act-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trade-secrets-act-guide/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 325C protects information with independent economic value that is not readily ascertainable and is the subject of reasonable efforts to keep it secret. Exemplary damages up to twice compensatory, attorney&apos;s fees running both directions, and a three-year clock from discovery under § 325C.06.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Whether a Minnesota LLC Member Can See the Books Turns on One Word in the Operating Agreement</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-member-information-rights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-member-information-rights/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0410 gives a member-managed LLC member a broad, purpose-free right to records — and gives a manager-managed member a narrower one. A dissociated member keeps a third right entirely.</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Dissolving a Minnesota Company Does Not End Its Liabilities. It Is a Procedure for Ending Them — and Most Companies Skip the Part That Works.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-corporate-dissolution-winding-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-corporate-dissolution-winding-up/</guid><description>Dissolution under Minn. Stat. §§ 302A.701–302A.791, with the LLC parallel at §§ 322C.0701–322C.0708. The claims procedure is what cuts off exposure: 90 days with notice, two years without — and an administratively dissolved corporation gets neither.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Mechanic&apos;s Liens Run on Three Clocks. Miss Any One and the Lien Is Gone.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mechanics-lien-deadlines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-mechanics-lien-deadlines/</guid><description>45 days for the subcontractor pre-lien notice, 120 days to record and serve the lien statement, one year to sue. Minn. Stat. ch. 514 forgives almost nothing, and the deadlines start earlier than most contractors think.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has Been Quietly Making Contract Terms Non-Exportable Since 1973. Four Statutes Later, It Is a Drafting Rule — Not a List of Exceptions.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-choice-of-law-you-cannot-export/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-choice-of-law-you-cannot-export/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 80C.21, § 337.10, subd. 1, § 325E.37, subd. 7, and § 181.988, subd. 3 each void an out-of-state choice-of-law or forum clause in a defined class of contract. Read together they describe a rule; the FAA question at the edge is genuinely unsettled.</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Franchise Act Is a Disclosure Statute With a Termination Statute Hidden Inside It</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-franchise-act-80c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-franchise-act-80c/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 80C registers the sale of franchises — but what franchisees need is § 80C.14&apos;s 90-day termination notice and 180-day nonrenewal rule, § 80C.17&apos;s fee-shifting, and § 80C.21, which voids any waiver or choice-of-law clause.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Power of Attorney Is the Cheapest Document You Will Ever Regret Not Having</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-power-of-attorney-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-power-of-attorney-guide/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 523 provides a statutory short form power of attorney with fourteen categories of authority. Durability is elected on the form, the principal&apos;s signature must be notarized, and gifts to the agent themselves require a separate express authorization.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Attachment Statute Is Not a Collection Tool. It Is an Accusation.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-attachment-prejudgment-remedy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-attachment-prejudgment-remedy/</guid><description>Prejudgment attachment under Minn. Stat. ch. 570 is Minnesota&apos;s rarest creditor remedy because § 570.02 makes the grounds intent-based — and only four of the six can support an ex parte seizure under § 570.025.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In a Minnesota Valuation Fight, Whoever Carries the Burden Usually Loses — and the Legislature Assigned That Burden in Opposite Directions Across Four Nearly Identical Statutes.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-burden-of-proof-on-value/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-burden-of-proof-on-value/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 336.9-626(a)(2) and (a)(4), § 302A.751, subd. 2, §§ 513.42(b), 513.44(c), 513.45(c), 513.48(g), and § 550.175, subd. 1 all answer the question &apos;what is this worth?&apos; — and they hand the burden to a different party each time.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Lets You Take the Property Back Before Anyone Proves Anything. That Is Why Chapter 565 Is Mostly About Notice.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-replevin-claim-and-delivery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-replevin-claim-and-delivery/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 565 moves possession of personal property before judgment: § 565.23 after notice and hearing, § 565.24 before it, plus bonds, redelivery rights, and the UCC Article 9 problem that sends a secured party to court at all.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Eviction Moves in Days, Not Months — and a Tenant Can Undo It by Paying $5 Plus the Rent</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-eviction-timeline-redemption/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-eviction-timeline-redemption/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.321 sets the hearing 7 to 14 days out, and § 504B.291 lets a nonpayment tenant redeem the tenancy any time before possession is delivered. Skip the 14-day residential notice and the case is dismissed and expunged.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has No Statute That Reduces Your Future Damages to Present Value</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-future-damages-and-present-value/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-future-damages-and-present-value/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.07 was repealed in 1988 and §§ 604.08–604.09 in 1994. What survives is § 549.25 — a hearing, not a discount — and a past/future split that exists because the interest statute needs it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Vulnerable Adults Act Does Not Give You a Nursing Home Neglect Claim. It Gives You Something Better and Something Narrower.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nursing-home-neglect-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nursing-home-neglect-claims/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 626.557 creates a private treble-damages action for financial exploitation only. For neglect and abuse it supplies a mandatory report, a state investigation, and a public memorandum — and the negligence case still has to stand on its own.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>How Long Do You Have to Sue in Minnesota? The Six-Year Rule, and the Exceptions That Ruin People.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-statutes-of-limitations-civil-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-statutes-of-limitations-civil-claims/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 541.05 gives six years for most contract and tort claims — but strict product liability gets four, and a long list of claims run on much shorter clocks. The most expensive mistake in civil litigation is arriving late.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>There Is No Such Thing as *The* Successor Liability Test in Minnesota. There Are at Least Four, They Run Simultaneously, and the Deal That Beats One Walks Into Another.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-successor-liability-four-tests/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-successor-liability-four-tests/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 302A.661, subd. 4 protects an asset buyer — and expressly preserves liability imposed by &apos;other statutes of this state.&apos; Those statutes include § 181.723, subd. 7(e) and the UVTA at §§ 513.41–.51, with federal MPPAA overlay at 29 U.S.C. § 1384.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>If Your Minnesota Property Is Landlocked, You May Not Need an Easement at All. You May Need a Town Board.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-easements-and-access-disputes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-easements-and-access-disputes/</guid><description>Easements arise by grant, implication, and prescription — and Minn. Stat. § 508.02 wipes out the unrecorded ones on Torrens land. But Minn. Stat. § 164.08, subd. 2 says a town board &quot;shall establish a cartway.&quot;</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Parent Cannot Settle a Minnesota Child&apos;s Injury Claim. Only a Judge Can.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-minor-settlement-court-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-minor-settlement-court-approval/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 540.08 makes an unapproved settlement of a minor&apos;s claim invalid, and Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 145 supplies the machinery — including a rule that reaches claims with no lawsuit on file, and a fund the child cannot touch at 18 without a second order.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Buy-Sell Agreement Is the Only Estate Plan Your Business Has. Most Minnesota Companies Do Not Have One.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/buy-sell-agreements-minnesota-closely-held/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/buy-sell-agreements-minnesota-closely-held/</guid><description>A buy-sell agreement decides what happens when an owner dies, divorces, quits, or is forced out. In Minnesota it does something more: under Minn. Stat. § 302A.751, subd. 3a, buy-sell agreements are presumed to reflect shareholders&apos; reasonable expectations concerning the matters they deal with.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota the Driver Is Deemed the Owner&apos;s Agent — Which Is Why the Real Defendant Is Often Not Behind the Wheel</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-vehicle-owner-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-vehicle-owner-liability/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 169.09, subd. 5a makes a permissive driver the owner&apos;s agent &apos;in case of accident.&apos; No cap, no theft exception, no presumption of consent — and the leading cases all cite a statute number that no longer exists.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Consortium Claim Is Not the Spouse&apos;s Own Case. It Is a Passenger on Someone Else&apos;s.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-loss-of-consortium/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-loss-of-consortium/</guid><description>Minnesota&apos;s spousal consortium claim comes from Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. (1969), not from a statute, and it was created with conditions attached — including a joinder rule that kills the claim if the injured spouse&apos;s case goes to trial without it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Seller Disclosure Statute Is Built Around What the Seller Knew. That Makes the File, Not the House, the Evidence.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-purchase-agreement-disclosure-duties/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-purchase-agreement-disclosure-duties/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 513.55 requires disclosure of material facts &quot;of which the seller is aware,&quot; and § 513.57 immunizes everything outside that knowledge. Section 513.60&apos;s waiver does not reach the well, septic, meth, or radon statutes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Your Minnesota Operating Agreement Will Be Judged on the Day You Signed It — Not on How the Deal Turned Out</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-fiduciary-duty-vs-operating-agreement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-fiduciary-duty-vs-operating-agreement/</guid><description>Everyone reads the two lists in Minn. Stat. § 322C.0110 — what an operating agreement may not do, and what it may. I try duty-term disputes on subdivision 8, which fixes when, by whom, and on what record the term gets tested.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has Two Ways to Move a Property Line, and They Share Almost Nothing. On Torrens Land, Only One of Them Works.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-adverse-possession-boundary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-adverse-possession-boundary/</guid><description>Adverse possession under Minn. Stat. § 541.02 and boundary by practical location are different doctrines with different elements and different proof. Minn. Stat. § 508.02 bars the first on registered land and expressly preserves the second.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Against a Minnesota City, the Deadline That Ends Your Case Is Not the Statute of Limitations</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-injury-claim-against-a-city/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-injury-claim-against-a-city/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 466.05 requires written notice to a municipality&apos;s governing body within 180 days of discovering the injury. Minn. Stat. § 466.04 caps damages, § 466.03 lists the immunities, and § 466.06 contains the one lever most claimants never pull.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota Construction, Every Worker Is an Employee by Default. Fourteen Requirements Get You Out — and You Must Meet Every One.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-worker-misclassification-181723/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-worker-misclassification-181723/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.723 makes every individual performing building construction services an employee unless they operate as a business entity meeting all fourteen statutory requirements — with penalties up to $10,000 per worker and personal liability for owners.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Jury Will Never Hear That You Weren&apos;t Wearing a Seat Belt — or That You Were</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-seat-belt-evidence-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-seat-belt-evidence-rule/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 169.685, subd. 4 makes proof of seat belt and child restraint use or nonuse inadmissible in any litigation involving personal injury or property damage from the use or operation of a motor vehicle. The bar runs both ways, with one exception.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota, a Lender That Forecloses the Fast Way Usually Gives Up the Right to Sue You for the Shortfall</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-foreclosure-by-advertisement-redemption/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-foreclosure-by-advertisement-redemption/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 580 lets a mortgagee foreclose without a lawsuit. But Minn. Stat. § 582.30, subd. 2 bars a deficiency judgment after an advertisement foreclosure with a six-month redemption period. The redemption period is the whole case.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Caps What a Health Plan Can Take From Your Settlement. Whether the Cap Reaches Your Plan Depends on Who Wrote the Check.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-health-plan-subrogation-limits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-health-plan-subrogation-limits/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 62A.095 forbids a health plan&apos;s subrogation clause unless it applies only after full recovery and is reduced by a pro rata share of fees and costs. Self-funded ERISA plans argue the limit does not reach them.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Seller Can Take Back the House and Keep Every Dollar You Paid — Without Ever Filing Suit</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-contract-for-deed-cancellation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-contract-for-deed-cancellation/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 559.21 lets a contract for deed seller terminate the contract by serving a notice and waiting. The cure period is 60 days on most modern contracts, 30 on some, 90 on others — and almost everyone remembers the wrong rule.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Expert Affidavit Deadlines Are Not on the Calendar. One Starts When Your Opponent Says So.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-expert-affidavit-merits-gate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-expert-affidavit-merits-gate/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 544.42 and § 145.682 require expert affidavits in professional and malpractice cases, and both make dismissal with prejudice mandatory. Neither deadline runs from a court filing, and the two statutes are not the twins they look like.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Took the Non-Compete Away. It Did Not Take the Protection Away — It Moved It Somewhere Most Employers Have Never Built.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-employee-noncompete-alternatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-employee-noncompete-alternatives/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.988 voids employee non-competes signed on or after July 1, 2023. What remains is ch. 325C and the DTSA, the carve-outs in subd. 1(a), § 181.9881, the sale exception, and the duty of loyalty.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Fight With Your Own No-Fault Insurer Does Not Go to a Jury. It Goes to One Arbitrator Who Is Only Half Trusted With the Law.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-arbitration-mandatory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-arbitration-mandatory/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 65B.525 forces no-fault benefit claims of $10,000 or less into binding arbitration under the Minnesota No-Fault Arbitration Rules. The arbitrator&apos;s fact findings are final; the arbitrator&apos;s legal conclusions are reviewed de novo.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Voids Five Clauses in Your Construction Contract No Matter What You Signed</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-contract-void-clauses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-contract-void-clauses/</guid><description>Chapter 337 makes broad-form indemnity, additional-insured coverage for someone else&apos;s negligence, out-of-state choice of law and forum, and pre-payment lien waivers void in Minnesota building and construction contracts — and deems a 10-day prompt-payment term into every one of them.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Tort Threshold Subtracts the Two Bills a Hurt Person Is Most Likely to Run Up</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-tort-threshold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-tort-threshold/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 3 bars noneconomic damages in a Minnesota motor vehicle case unless a threshold is met — and the $4,000 computation removes diagnostic x-rays and rehabilitative treatment from the total before it is measured.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Discrimination Claims Are Usually Lost on the Calendar, Not the Merits</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-human-rights-act-deadlines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-human-rights-act-deadlines/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 363A.28, subd. 3(a) gives one year from the occurrence. Then § 363A.33, subd. 1 adds 45- and 90-day windows, § 363A.07, subd. 3 makes the forum choice exclusive, and § 363A.31 gives 15 days to rescind a release. I map the machine.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Revocable Trust You Signed and Never Funded Does Almost Nothing</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unfunded-revocable-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-unfunded-revocable-trust/</guid><description>A Minnesota revocable trust controls the property actually transferred to it. It reaches anything else only through an instrument that points at it — a pour-over will under Minn. Stat. § 524.2-511, a beneficiary designation, a transfer on death deed — and the pour-over route runs the assets you paid to keep out of probate straight through probate.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Reduces a Verdict Three Times, in a Fixed Order — and the Order Is Worth Real Money</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-comparative-fault-collateral-source/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-comparative-fault-collateral-source/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 548.251 and § 604.01 answer two different questions, and § 548.251, subd. 3(c) fixes the sequence between them. Collateral sources come off before the fault reduction; settlement credits come off after. Same dollars, different result.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Gives Every Employee Free Discovery Before the Lawsuit Exists. Almost Nobody Uses It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-personnel-record-review-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-personnel-record-review-act/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 181.960–181.966 give an employee the right to review and copy the personnel record on written request — seven working days, no fee — and § 181.963 bars the employer from later using what it left out.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Trustee Can Lose Money and Be Fine, or Make Money and Be Liable</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-investment-prudent-investor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-investment-prudent-investor/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0901 judges a trustee&apos;s investments at the portfolio level and by process, not by results. The trustee who documented a strategy is defensible; the one who just held what the settlor left is not.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Whether Minnesota&apos;s Consumer Protection Statutes Pay You Depends on Who You Are. That Is the Whole Case.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-fraud-act-deceptive-trade-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-fraud-act-deceptive-trade-practices/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 325F.70, subd. 3 gives a consumer a direct damages remedy under the Consumer Fraud Act that the statute itself deems to benefit the public. Everyone else is back in § 8.31 and Ly v. Nystrom. The Deceptive Trade Practices Act pays nobody.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Trustee Starts the Clock on Your Claim Against the Trustee</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-liability-and-exculpation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-liability-and-exculpation/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.1005 gives a Minnesota beneficiary three years from a report that adequately disclosed a potential claim — and the trustee decides when to send it, by a method that does not require you to receive it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Does Not Ban Workplace Drug Testing. It Makes Your Policy Document the Thing You Get Sued Over.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-drug-alcohol-testing-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-drug-alcohol-testing-employees/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. §§ 181.950–181.957 an employer may not request or require a drug or alcohol test except as authorized — and nothing is authorized unless it is done pursuant to a written policy meeting § 181.952, subd. 1.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Supplemental Needs Trust Has to Exist Before the Money Arrives</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-supplemental-needs-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-supplemental-needs-trust/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.1205 protects a disabled beneficiary&apos;s public benefits — but only if someone else&apos;s money funds it. A settlement or an inheritance that lands first is a different, harder problem.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Whistleblower Act Protects the Report, Not the Reporter&apos;s Motive — and Since 2013 It Has Not Mattered Whether the Employee Was Right</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-whistleblower-act-181932/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-whistleblower-act-181932/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 181.932 protects six categories of conduct. Since the 2013 amendment defining &apos;good faith&apos; in § 181.931, subd. 4, the only state-of-mind question left is whether the report was knowingly false or reckless.</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Prejudgment Interest Statute Is Not a Damages Rule. It Is a Machine That Prices Your Settlement Offer.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-prejudgment-interest-settlement-offers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-prejudgment-interest-settlement-offers/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(b), the party whose written settlement offer lands closer to the verdict controls who gets preverdict interest and on what amount — and subd. 1(c) sets a flat ten percent above $50,000.</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Directed Trusts and Trust Protectors: Who Is Actually on the Hook?</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-directed-trust-and-trust-protectors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-directed-trust-and-trust-protectors/</guid><description>Minnesota lets a trust split the trustee&apos;s job among an investment advisor, a distribution advisor, and a trust protector. Minn. Stat. § 501C.0808 decides who is liable — and the default surprises every settlor I explain it to.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Recreational Land Use Statute Does Not Protect the Landowner Who Stays Quiet. It Protects the One Who Says Yes.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-recreational-land-use-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-recreational-land-use-liability/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 604A.20–604A.27 strip a landowner&apos;s duty of care toward recreational users — but only for an owner &apos;who gives written or oral permission ... without charge.&apos; Section 604A.27 keeps that permission from ripening into an easement.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Lets Beneficiaries Remove a Trustee Without Proving a Thing. The No-Fault Ground Has Four Elements, and Most Petitions Miss Two of Them.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-removing-a-trustee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-removing-a-trustee/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0706(b)(4) is the cheapest removal ground in Minnesota trust law — and the easiest to plead badly. Read the trust&apos;s own removal clause before you file anything.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In a Private Minnesota Corporation, a Shareholder&apos;s Right to See the Books Is Absolute. Ten Days, No Reason Required.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-shareholder-books-records-inspection/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-shareholder-books-records-inspection/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 302A.461, subd. 4(a) gives a shareholder of a non-publicly-held Minnesota corporation an absolute right to inspect the share register and ten enumerated categories of record — no proper purpose to prove, and attorney fees if the company refuses. I explain how to use it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Does Not Let a Family Sue for a Wrongful Death. It Lets a Trustee Sue for Them.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wrongful-death-trustee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-wrongful-death-trustee/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 573.02 hands the cause of action to a court-appointed trustee, not to the spouse or the children. Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 144 supplies the machinery — and a 2023 amendment quietly enlarged what that trustee may recover.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>In Minnesota You Are Not Allowed to Plead Punitive Damages. You Have to Win Them Twice.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-punitive-damages-permission-549191/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-punitive-damages-permission-549191/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 549.191 forbids a complaint from seeking punitive damages and requires a motion, affidavits, and a prima facie showing first. Read with § 549.20 and § 544.36, it means a Minnesota complaint may not say what the case is worth.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Trustee Controls the Clock on a Minnesota Trust Contest. A Single Mailing Cuts Three Years Down to 120 Days.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-contest-deadline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trust-contest-deadline/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0605 gives a revocable-trust contestant three years — unless the trustee sends a copy of the instrument and a four-item notice. Then it is 120 days. Note the section number.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Dog-Bite Statute Deletes Almost Everything a Plaintiff Normally Has to Prove. The Whole Case Lives in Two Phrases.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dog-bite-statute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dog-bite-statute/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 347.22 makes a dog&apos;s owner liable for &apos;the full amount of the injury sustained&apos; — no negligence, no prior bite, no scienter. All that is left to fight about is provocation and whether the person was lawfully present.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>&quot;Irrevocable&quot; Describes Who Cannot Change It Alone — Not Whether It Can Be Changed. Minnesota Has Six Doors.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-modify-or-terminate-irrevocable-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-modify-or-terminate-irrevocable-trust/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 501C.0410 through 501C.0417 supply six ways to modify or terminate an irrevocable Minnesota trust. Only one of them beats a material purpose, and only one needs no judge.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Dram Shop Notice Deadline Starts Running the Day the Client Hires a Lawyer</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dram-shop-liability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-dram-shop-liability/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 340A.801 creates a claim against a vendor who caused an intoxication by an illegal sale. Minn. Stat. § 340A.802 conditions it on written notice served within 240 days of the date counsel is retained — and bars the action without it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Most Minnesota Trust Disputes Can Be Settled Without Filing Anything. The Catch Is That Nobody Ever Rules on Whether You Did It Right.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nonjudicial-settlement-agreement-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-nonjudicial-settlement-agreement-trust/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0111 lets interested persons resolve almost any trust matter by written agreement. It buys speed and privacy — and leaves a defect that only a court order can cure.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota No-Fault Is Sold as a Trade. The Half You Give Up Is Decided by a Doctor, Months After the Crash.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-auto-basics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-no-fault-auto-basics/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 65B pays $40,000 in basic economic loss benefits regardless of fault. Section 65B.51, subd. 3 then bars any recovery for noneconomic detriment unless a $4,000 net medical figure — or one of four injury categories — is met.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Trustee Reporting Duty Has No Deadline and No Required Contents. The Statute of Limitations Is What Makes Trustees Report.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-duty-to-inform-beneficiaries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-trustee-duty-to-inform-beneficiaries/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0813 is three paragraphs long. It sets no schedule, prescribes no report format, and reaches only irrevocable trusts — so the real engine is § 501C.1005.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Minnesota Deadlines That Ruin Cases Are the Ones With No Date on Them</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-deadlines-that-run-from-a-fact/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-deadlines-that-run-from-a-fact/</guid><description>A deadline running from a filing is a calendar entry. A deadline running from &apos;the last item of work,&apos; &apos;first furnished,&apos; or &apos;should have been discovered&apos; is a fact question — and in Minnesota those are the ones that forfeit rights.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0110, Subd. 3 Has Eleven Clauses and Three Different Grammars. Everyone Argues About the Two That Are Not Absolute.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-operating-agreement-cannot-override/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-operating-agreement-cannot-override/</guid><description>Seven of the eleven restrictions on a Minnesota operating agreement admit no exception at all — including the one that makes Minnesota law non-negotiable for a Minnesota LLC&apos;s internal affairs, and the one that follows a void term into the articles of organization.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Piercing the Corporate Veil Is the Hardest Way to Reach a Minnesota Business Owner. There Are at Least Eight Easier Ones.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-reaching-the-owner-without-piercing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-reaching-the-owner-without-piercing/</guid><description>Victoria Elevator requires a multi-factor showing plus injustice. Minn. Stat. § 270C.56, § 302A.559, § 181.723, subd. 7(d), § 336.3-402, and § 513.48 require none of it — and reach the owner directly.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Four Months to Present a Claim Against a Minnesota Estate — Unless You Were Never Told, and Then It Is a Year</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-probate-creditor-claims-four-months/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-probate-creditor-claims-four-months/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.3-803 bars claims against a decedent&apos;s estate after four months from published notice. But a &apos;known and identified&apos; creditor gets served, and I explain why the personal representative who fails to look for one has a problem of their own.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Decides Which Wrongs Get Remedied by Deciding Who Pays the Lawyer. Here Is the Map.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-attorney-fee-shifting-map/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-attorney-fee-shifting-map/</guid><description>Minnesota shifts attorney fees in some claims, refuses to in others, and in one instance caps the fee at $5. Read together — § 8.31, § 325F.70, § 181.171, § 337.10, § 325C.04, § 302A.461 — the pattern is not about the seriousness of the wrong.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Converting a Minnesota LLC to a Corporation Moves Nothing. That Is the Whole Point — and It Is Why Dissolving and Re-forming Costs So Much.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-conversion-and-merger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-conversion-and-merger/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 322C.1001–322C.1016 make merger, conversion, and domestication statutory transactions with a filed plan and a unanimity default. Section 322C.1010, subd. 1: the converted organization &apos;is for all purposes the same entity that existed before.&apos;</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Company Can Be Solvent and Insolvent at the Same Time. Four Statutes, Four Tests, One Balance Sheet.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insolvent-means-four-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insolvent-means-four-things/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 513.42, § 302A.551, § 322C.0405, § 576.25, and 11 U.S.C. § 101(32) all turn on insolvency and none of them measures it the same way. I explain how a lawful corporate distribution can be a voidable transfer on identical facts.</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s LLC Act Mentions a One-Owner Company Twice. Everywhere Else It Is Silent — and the Silence Is Where the Exposure Is.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-single-member-llc-limits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-single-member-llc-limits/</guid><description>Chapter 322C never addresses single-member companies except to confirm a sole member has an operating agreement. It does not say whether the § 322C.0503 charging order protects one. It does say the company dissolves 90 days after the owner dies.</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Quitting a Minnesota LLC Is Always Permitted and Almost Never Advisable. You Do Not Get Paid, and You Lose the Statute That Would Have Paid You.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-dissociation-what-you-lose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-dissociation-what-you-lose/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0601 gives every member the power to walk out. Section 322C.0603 turns the interest into a bare transferable interest. There is no buyout — and § 322C.0102, subd. 15 quietly strips the standing to ask for one.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Usury Cap Is 8%. The Reason Almost Nobody Hits It Is a Single Sentence in Minn. Stat. § 334.01.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-usury-business-loan-interest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-usury-business-loan-interest/</guid><description>Minnesota caps interest at $8 on $100 per year — but subd. 2 exempts written credit extensions of $100,000 or more entirely, and § 334.011 gives business and agricultural loans a floating cap. Violate the business cap and the entire interest is forfeited.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Ban-the-Box Law Is Two Different Statutes Wearing One Chapter Number</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-criminal-history-hiring-364/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-criminal-history-hiring-364/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 364.021 bars a public or private employer from asking about criminal history before the interview. But the direct-relationship standard in § 364.03 and the written-explanation duty in § 364.05 reach only public employment and licensing — and § 364.06, subd. 2(d) makes the private-employer remedy exclusive.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s LLC Act Has No Law of Capital Calls. Your Operating Agreement Is the Whole Statute — and the Penalty Rule Is the Only Thing Above It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-capital-calls-and-dilution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-capital-calls-and-dilution/</guid><description>Chapter 322C never uses the words capital call, capital account, dilution, or forfeiture. Minn. Stat. § 322C.0401, subd. 5 says a member need not contribute at all. What that leaves is a contract — measured against Gorco Construction Co. v. Stein.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Makes a Secured Farm Creditor Ask First. The Prohibition Is Not in Chapter 583.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-farmer-lender-mediation-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-farmer-lender-mediation-act/</guid><description>The Farmer-Lender Mediation Act conditions foreclosure, repossession, contract for deed cancellation, garnishment, and levy on a mediation notice — but the operative bars sit in Minn. Stat. §§ 336.9-601(h), 550.365, 559.209, and 582.039. Sections 583.20 to 583.32 expire June 30, 2027.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Indemnification Pays After. Advancement Pays Now. Minnesota LLCs Give You Both — Until the Operating Agreement Takes Them Away</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-indemnification-advancement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-indemnification-advancement/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0408 makes indemnification and advancement of defense costs mandatory for Minnesota LLCs by default. Section 322C.0408, subd. 4 lets the operating agreement delete both.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Best Argument Against a Minnesota Guardianship Petition Is Usually a Document Signed Years Earlier</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-guardianship-conservatorship/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-guardianship-conservatorship/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 524.5-310 and § 524.5-409 both require the court to find that the respondent&apos;s needs cannot be met by less restrictive means — and both name the alternative: a health care agent under ch. 145C, an attorney-in-fact under § 523.01. I explain how to use that.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Abolished the LLC Business Card: The Statement of Authority Nobody Files</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-statement-of-authority/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-statement-of-authority/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0301 ends status-based agency for LLC members. Section 322C.0302 replaces it with an optional filing I rarely see used — one that grants power broadly, limits it narrowly, and never expires.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Improper LLC Distributions in Minnesota: Who Pays It Back, and Why Two Years Is Not the Outer Limit</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-improper-distributions-clawback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-improper-distributions-clawback/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 322C.0405 and 322C.0406 impose a fault-based clawback on the people who approved a distribution and a knowledge-based one on the people who took it. I read the two-year bar as covering far less than it appears to.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Spendthrift Clause Protects the Interest, Not the Money. In Minnesota, the Whole Fight Is About Timing.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-spendthrift-trusts-creditors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-spendthrift-trusts-creditors/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 501C.0502 stops a creditor from reaching a beneficiary&apos;s interest or a distribution &quot;before its receipt.&quot; Sections 501C.0504 and 501C.0506 mark the two edges of that protection — and Minnesota&apos;s chapter has no § 501C.0501 and no § 501C.0503 at all.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Gives a Fired Employee 24 Hours&apos; Leverage. Most Employers Do Not Know the Clock Exists.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-final-paycheck-181-13/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-final-paycheck-181-13/</guid><description>Under Minn. Stat. § 181.13, wages owed a discharged employee are due immediately on written demand, and the employer is in default 24 hours later — with a penalty of one day&apos;s average earnings for every day, up to 15. Attorney fees are mandatory.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The 50/50 Minnesota LLC: Why Judicial Dissolution Is the Wrong Remedy and the Only One You Have Left</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-deadlock-fifty-fifty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-deadlock-fifty-fifty/</guid><description>Chapter 322C gives a deadlocked LLC member a dissolution petition and — read closely — no buyout to go with it. The exit has to be built into the operating agreement first.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Charging Order: What a Judgment Creditor of a Minnesota LLC Member Actually Gets</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-charging-order-exclusive-remedy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-llc-charging-order-exclusive-remedy/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0503 makes the charging order the exclusive remedy against a member&apos;s transferable interest. Read closely, it is narrower than both sides usually think.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Estate Recovery Claim Does Not Chase the Person. It Chases the Asset.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-assistance-estate-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-assistance-estate-recovery/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 256B.15 defines &quot;estate&quot; to include life estates, joint tenancies, pay-on-death accounts, living trusts, and transfer on death deeds, and § 514.981 puts a lien on the house while the recipient is still alive. Neither is stopped by avoiding probate.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Will Let You Contract Away Almost Anything — Except the Things That Let a Court Find Out What Happened</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-what-you-cannot-agree-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-what-you-cannot-agree-to/</guid><description>Read § 322C.0110, § 337.02, § 337.05, § 337.10, § 336.9-602, § 325E.61, and § 504B.365 together and a pattern appears: Minnesota&apos;s non-waivable core is not substance. It is access, information, and forum. I make the case.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>commentary</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Tenants Can Sue Over Conditions Without Waiting to Be Evicted — But Only If They Keep Paying Rent</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tenant-habitability-rent-escrow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-tenant-habitability-rent-escrow/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 504B.161 makes the covenants of habitability unwaivable, and § 504B.385 lets a residential tenant deposit rent with the court administrator 14 days after written notice. The catch sits in subdivision 1(d): a tenant may not withhold rent.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Antitrust Act Copies the Sherman Act, Then Breaks From It in the One Place Plaintiffs Care About</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-antitrust-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-antitrust-act/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 325D.49–325D.66 mirror Sherman Act §§ 1 and 2 almost word for word. But § 325D.57 gives treble damages to anyone &apos;injured directly or indirectly&apos; — and the act contains no provision telling courts to follow federal law.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Homestead Exemption Covers Up to 160 Acres. It Also Has Five Holes in It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-homestead-exemption-creditors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-homestead-exemption-creditors/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 510.02 shields hundreds of thousands of dollars of homestead value across as much as 160 acres, on an amount that adjusts every even-numbered year. But § 510.05 lists exactly what the shield does not stop, and § 510.07 lets you abandon it by accident. I walk through all four sections.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Financial Exploitation of a Vulnerable Adult Is Three Separate Questions in Minnesota, and They Do Not Share a Definition</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-vulnerable-adult-financial-exploitation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-vulnerable-adult-financial-exploitation/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 609.2335 makes financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult a crime, § 626.557 makes it reportable within 24 hours, and § 626.557, subd. 20 gives the adult a treble-damages claim — on definitions that do not match.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Is a One-Party Consent State for Conversations and Not a Consent State at All for Images</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-surveillance-recording-consent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-surveillance-recording-consent/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 626A.02, subd. 2(d) lets a party to a conversation record it, and § 626A.13 gives the person recorded a civil action worth at least $10,000 when it does not. Section 609.746 governs cameras, contains no one-party rule, and creates no civil remedy at all.</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The UCC Gives Buyers Warranties, Then Hands Sellers Three Ways to Take Them Back</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ucc-article-2-warranties/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-ucc-article-2-warranties/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 336.2-313 to 336.2-316 create and disclaim warranties on the sale of goods; § 336.2-607(3)(a) bars the buyer who fails to notify; § 336.2-719 lets a seller cap the remedy — until the cap fails of its essential purpose.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>A Minnesota Clinic Can Run a Perfectly HIPAA-Compliant Release Process and Still Be Breaking Minnesota Law</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-records-and-privacy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-medical-records-and-privacy/</guid><description>The Minnesota Health Records Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 144.291–144.298, requires signed consent for releases that HIPAA permits outright. Section 144.292 sets a 30-day access deadline and a capped fee schedule; § 144.298 gives the patient a private action against the requester as well as the releaser.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>On a Minnesota Sidewalk, Who Owns the Building Next to the Ice Decides the Case Before Anyone Looks at the Ice</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-premises-liability-snow-and-ice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-premises-liability-snow-and-ice/</guid><description>Minnesota abolished the invitee/licensee distinction in 1972, but Minn. Stat. § 466.03, subd. 4 immunizes municipalities for snow and ice on most public sidewalks, § 466.03, subd. 6e immunizes parks, and § 466.05 gives a claimant 180 days to present notice.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Co-Ownership Has No Exit. Partition Is the Exit, and Minnesota Just Rewrote It.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-partition-actions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-partition-actions/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 558 governs partition actions commenced before August 1, 2025; the new Minnesota Partition Act, ch. 558A, governs everything after. The new act replaces &apos;great prejudice&apos; with a seven-factor test — and adds attorney fees enforceable against the homestead.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>The Coverage You Bought for the Worst Crash Is the One You Are Most Likely to Throw Away, and the Act That Throws It Away Looks Like Progress</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-uninsured-underinsured-motorist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-uninsured-underinsured-motorist/</guid><description>Minnesota requires every auto policy to carry uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage under Minn. Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 3a. Section 65B.49, subd. 4a sets the payout against what the at-fault driver actually paid, and subd. 10 now puts a four-year clock on UIM.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Forming a Minnesota Company Takes an Afternoon. The Renewal Is What Actually Protects You.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-small-business-startup-checklist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-small-business-startup-checklist/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 322C.0201 forms an LLC on filing and a $135 payment. Minn. Stat. § 302A.821, subd. 4(b) administratively dissolves a corporation that skips its annual renewal — and says that corporation &apos;is not entitled to the benefits of section 302A.781,&apos; the claims bar.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Never Created a Bad Faith Tort. It Created a Formula, and Put It Behind a Motion.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insurance-bad-faith-604-18/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-insurance-bad-faith-604-18/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 604.18 gives a first-party insured taxable costs — half the proceeds above the insurer&apos;s pre-trial offer, capped at $250,000, plus fees capped at $100,000 — but only after a motion to amend, only from the judge, and never after arbitration or appraisal.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Harassment Restraining Order Is the One That Does Not Ask Who the Person Is to You</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-harassment-restraining-orders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-harassment-restraining-orders/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 609.748 defines harassment &apos;regardless of the relationship between the actor and the intended target&apos; — the opposite of the order for protection under § 518B.01, which begins and ends with relationship. I walk through both sides of the caption.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Child Support Is a Formula. Two of Its Inputs Do Almost All the Arguing.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parenting-time-and-support-basics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-parenting-time-and-support-basics/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 518A.34 sets a six-step computation, § 518A.35 supplies the guideline table, and § 518A.36 adjusts for parenting time by cubing each parent&apos;s annual overnights. Parenting time and imputed income under § 518A.32 are where Minnesota support cases are actually fought.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Conciliation Court Handles Claims Up to $20,000. Most People Use It Wrong, and Some Should Not Use It at All.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-conciliation-court-guide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-conciliation-court-guide/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 491A.01 sets the conciliation court limit at $20,000 — but only $4,000 for consumer credit transactions, and eleven categories of claim are excluded outright. The 21-day removal window is where most of the real damage happens.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Debt Settlement Statute Never Asks Whether the Settlement Worked. It Asks When You Got Paid.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-legal-funding-debt-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-consumer-legal-funding-debt-settlement/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. ch. 332B registers debt settlement providers and, at § 332B.09, subd. 3, forbids collecting any payment before the services are fully performed. Chapter 332A does the same job differently for debt management. Both carry private rights of action with statutory damages and fees.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota Has Its Own Debt Collection Statute. It Does Not Pay You — It Takes Their License.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-debt-collection-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-debt-collection-practices/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. §§ 332.31–332.44 license collection agencies and debt buyers and list 24 prohibited practices in § 332.37, including a clause making any FDCPA violation a Minnesota violation. But the private damages remedy lives in the federal statute, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item><item><title>Minnesota&apos;s Construction Repose Statute Does Not Bar Your Lawsuit. It Prevents Your Claim From Ever Existing.</title><link>https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-defect-repose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.madgettlaw.com/news/minnesota-construction-defect-repose/</guid><description>Minn. Stat. § 541.051 gives two years from discovery of the injury and ten years from substantial completion. The ten-year clause is written as a bar on accrual, not on filing — and read with ch. 327A&apos;s 1/2/10-year warranties, that changes what it does.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>article</category><author>David J.S. Madgett</author></item></channel></rss>